Background Preconditioning with repeated electroacupuncture （EA） could mimic ischemic preconditioning to induce cerebral ischemic tolerance in rats. The present study was designed to investigate whether mu（μ）-, d...Background Preconditioning with repeated electroacupuncture （EA） could mimic ischemic preconditioning to induce cerebral ischemic tolerance in rats. The present study was designed to investigate whether mu（μ）-, delta（δ）- or kappa（κ）-opioid receptors are involved in the neuroprotecUon induced by repeated EA preconditioning. Methods The rats were pretreated with naltrindole （NTI）, nor-binaltorphimine （nor-BNI） or D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D- Trp-Om-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 （CTOP）, which is a highly selective δ-, κ- or μ-opioid receptor antagonist respectively, before each EA preconditioning （30 minutes per day, 5 days）. Twenty-four hours after the last EA treatment, the middle cerebral artery occlusion （MCAO） was induced for 120 minutes. The brain infarct volume was determined with 2,3,5-tdphenyltetrazolium chloride staining at 24 hours after MCAO and compared with that in rats which only received EA preconditioning. In another experiment, the met-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity in rat brain was investigated by immunohistochemistry in both EA preconditioning and control rats. Results The EA preconditioning reduced brain infarct volume compared with the control rats （P=-0.000）. Administration of both NTI and CTOP attenuated the brain infarct volume reduction induced by EA preconditioning, presenting with larger infarct volume than that in the EA preconditioning rats （P〈0.001）. But nor-BNI administration did not block the infarct volume reduction induced by EA preconditioning, presenting with smaller infarct volume than the control group rats （P=-0.000）. The number of met-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity positive neurons in the EA preconditioning rats was more than that of the control rats （P=-0.000）. Conclusion Repeated EA preconditioning stimulates the release of enkephalins, which may bind 5- and p-opioid receptors to induce the tolerance against focal cerebral ischemia.展开更多
In this study, we hypothesized that an increase in integrin αβand its co-activator vascular endothelial growth factor play important neuroprotective roles in ischemic injury. We performed ischemic preconditioning wi...In this study, we hypothesized that an increase in integrin αβand its co-activator vascular endothelial growth factor play important neuroprotective roles in ischemic injury. We performed ischemic preconditioning with bilateral common carotid artery occlusion for 5 minutes in C57BL/6J mice. This was followed by ischemic injury with bilateral common carotid artery occlusion for 30 minutes. The time interval between ischemic preconditioning and lethal ischemia was 48 hours. Histopathological analysis showed that ischemic preconditioning substantially diminished damage to neurons in the hippocampus 7 days after ischemia. Evans Blue dye assay showed that ischemic preconditioning reduced damage to the blood-brain barrier 24 hours after ischemia. This demonstrates the neuroprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Western blot assay revealed a significant reduction in protein levels of integrin αβ, vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor in mice given ischemic preconditioning compared with mice not given ischemic preconditioning 24 hours after ischemia. These findings suggest that the neuroprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning is associated with lower integrin αβand vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the brain following ischemia.展开更多
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.30471664).
文摘Background Preconditioning with repeated electroacupuncture （EA） could mimic ischemic preconditioning to induce cerebral ischemic tolerance in rats. The present study was designed to investigate whether mu（μ）-, delta（δ）- or kappa（κ）-opioid receptors are involved in the neuroprotecUon induced by repeated EA preconditioning. Methods The rats were pretreated with naltrindole （NTI）, nor-binaltorphimine （nor-BNI） or D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D- Trp-Om-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 （CTOP）, which is a highly selective δ-, κ- or μ-opioid receptor antagonist respectively, before each EA preconditioning （30 minutes per day, 5 days）. Twenty-four hours after the last EA treatment, the middle cerebral artery occlusion （MCAO） was induced for 120 minutes. The brain infarct volume was determined with 2,3,5-tdphenyltetrazolium chloride staining at 24 hours after MCAO and compared with that in rats which only received EA preconditioning. In another experiment, the met-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity in rat brain was investigated by immunohistochemistry in both EA preconditioning and control rats. Results The EA preconditioning reduced brain infarct volume compared with the control rats （P=-0.000）. Administration of both NTI and CTOP attenuated the brain infarct volume reduction induced by EA preconditioning, presenting with larger infarct volume than that in the EA preconditioning rats （P〈0.001）. But nor-BNI administration did not block the infarct volume reduction induced by EA preconditioning, presenting with smaller infarct volume than the control group rats （P=-0.000）. The number of met-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity positive neurons in the EA preconditioning rats was more than that of the control rats （P=-0.000）. Conclusion Repeated EA preconditioning stimulates the release of enkephalins, which may bind 5- and p-opioid receptors to induce the tolerance against focal cerebral ischemia.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81071068the Israel Science Foundation-the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Joint Program),No.813111290the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province in China,No.2014A030313172
文摘In this study, we hypothesized that an increase in integrin αβand its co-activator vascular endothelial growth factor play important neuroprotective roles in ischemic injury. We performed ischemic preconditioning with bilateral common carotid artery occlusion for 5 minutes in C57BL/6J mice. This was followed by ischemic injury with bilateral common carotid artery occlusion for 30 minutes. The time interval between ischemic preconditioning and lethal ischemia was 48 hours. Histopathological analysis showed that ischemic preconditioning substantially diminished damage to neurons in the hippocampus 7 days after ischemia. Evans Blue dye assay showed that ischemic preconditioning reduced damage to the blood-brain barrier 24 hours after ischemia. This demonstrates the neuroprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Western blot assay revealed a significant reduction in protein levels of integrin αβ, vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor in mice given ischemic preconditioning compared with mice not given ischemic preconditioning 24 hours after ischemia. These findings suggest that the neuroprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning is associated with lower integrin αβand vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the brain following ischemia.
