期刊文献+

欧洲人权法院国家裁量余地原则理论探析 被引量:3

Research on the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine under the European Court of Human Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家裁量余地原则是欧洲人权法院在实务中逐步发展起来的原则,并通过判例法实践不断完善,现已成为欧洲人权法院的重要原则之一。它是辅助性原则的逻辑结果,基于调节各成员国之间文化多样性、平衡人权保障机制和成员国之间的权利分配、适应公约条文内容及结构特点产生。尽管目前学者对于这一原则的利弊分析不一,但该原则本身反应的国际人权保护机制应当尊重文化多样性,重视国内人权保护机制作用的理念值得深思和借鉴。 The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine developed from the practice in European Court of Human Rights,improvedthrough case law,now it has become one of the important principles of the court. It is the logical result of the principle ofsubsidiarity,produced on the coordination of cultural diversity among member states;balancing rights distribution betweenhuman rights protection mechanism and member states;adapting the content and structure characteristics of the conventionprovisions. Although some scholars have different ideas on the pros and cons of the principle,the concept of principle thatinternational human rights protection mechanism should respect cultural diversity and attach great importance to the domes-tic protection mechanism deserves thinking and learning.
作者 刘晓
机构地区 南开大学法学院
出处 《科学.经济.社会》 2016年第4期-,共7页 Science Economy Society
关键词 欧洲人权法院 欧洲人权公约 辅助性原则 国家裁量余地原则 the European Court of Human Rights the European Convention on Human Rights the Principle of Subsidiarity the Margin of Appreciation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献143

  • 1North Continental Shelf Case, I. C.J. Rep. 1969, p. 26, Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (UK v. Iceland) I. C.J. Rep. 1974,p. 33. 被引量:1
  • 2Nottebohm Case,I. C.J. Rep. 1955,p. 37. 被引量:1
  • 3Case of Certain Norwegian Loans,l. C.J. Rep. 1957,p. 9. 被引量:1
  • 4Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa, (Second Phase),[1966] I. CJ. Rep. 6 p. 10. 被引量:1
  • 5Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Compa- ny,Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (Second Phase) , [ 1970] I. CJ. Rep. (Vol. 1)p. 17. 被引量:1
  • 6Nuclear Tests Case ( Australia v. France ), I. C. J. Rep. 253 (1974) p. 362. 被引量:1
  • 7I.C. J. Rep. Sep. Op. p. 48. 被引量:1
  • 8Colombian-Peruvian Asylum Case, I. C.J. Rep. 1950, pp. 266, 275. 被引量:1
  • 9Case of Concerning The Application of the Convention of 1902 Governing the Guardianship of Infants ( Netherland v. Sweden ) I. C,J. Rep. 1957,p. 50. 被引量:1
  • 10Marian Nash Leich. Contemporary Practice of the Unit- ed Stares Relating to International Law[ J]. AJIL, 1987 ( 81 ) :940 - 943. 被引量:1

共引文献15

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部