摘要
Analyses of microbial properties in soil and manure had always included the problem that there was no available standard method to evaluate microbial property. The one of the major problems was the vast diversity and the enormous population of soil microorganisms [1], the other was an existence of numerically dominant unculturable microorganisms which comprise 99% of soil habitat [2]. We evaluated whether our newly developed method, by which taxonomies and their number of each bacterial groups were estimated, could be used as evaluation method of microbial properties of soils and manures. In the forest soil, β-Proteobacteria, which included Burkholderia sp., Ralstonia sp., and Alcaligenes sp., was numerically dominant bacteria (3.64 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN g<sup>-1</sup> dry soil), followed by γ-Proteobacteria (1.32 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), δ-Proteobacteria (0.006 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), and the other gram negative bacteria (0.006 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN). In the commercial manure, Actinobacteria, which included Streptoverticillium salmonis, Mycrococcus sp., Streptomyces bikiniensis, and Microbacterium ulmi, was numerically dominant bacterial group (30.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), followed by α-Proteobacteria (26.0 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), β-Proteobacteria (17.1 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), δ-Proteobacteria (11.2 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), the other Firmicutes (1.71 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), γ-Proteobacteria (0.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), and the other gram negative bacteria (0.05 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN). In the upland field, the other Firmicutes, which included Paenibacillus sp., was numerically dominant bacteria (4.41 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), followed by Actinobacteria (2.14 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), Bacillus sp. (2.14 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), and γ-Proteobacteria (0.35 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN). Although the precision of the affiliations became lower because of higher diversity of samples and the number of some Antinobacteria and Firmicutes might be underestimated by the used PCR condition, the method was found suitable as a candi
Analyses of microbial properties in soil and manure had always included the problem that there was no available standard method to evaluate microbial property. The one of the major problems was the vast diversity and the enormous population of soil microorganisms [1], the other was an existence of numerically dominant unculturable microorganisms which comprise 99% of soil habitat [2]. We evaluated whether our newly developed method, by which taxonomies and their number of each bacterial groups were estimated, could be used as evaluation method of microbial properties of soils and manures. In the forest soil, β-Proteobacteria, which included Burkholderia sp., Ralstonia sp., and Alcaligenes sp., was numerically dominant bacteria (3.64 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN g<sup>-1</sup> dry soil), followed by γ-Proteobacteria (1.32 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), δ-Proteobacteria (0.006 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), and the other gram negative bacteria (0.006 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN). In the commercial manure, Actinobacteria, which included Streptoverticillium salmonis, Mycrococcus sp., Streptomyces bikiniensis, and Microbacterium ulmi, was numerically dominant bacterial group (30.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), followed by α-Proteobacteria (26.0 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), β-Proteobacteria (17.1 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), δ-Proteobacteria (11.2 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), the other Firmicutes (1.71 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), γ-Proteobacteria (0.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), and the other gram negative bacteria (0.05 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN). In the upland field, the other Firmicutes, which included Paenibacillus sp., was numerically dominant bacteria (4.41 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), followed by Actinobacteria (2.14 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), Bacillus sp. (2.14 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN), and γ-Proteobacteria (0.35 × 10<sup>6</sup> MPN). Although the precision of the affiliations became lower because of higher diversity of samples and the number of some Antinobacteria and Firmicutes might be underestimated by the used PCR condition, the method was found suitable as a candi
