摘要
龙川学宫的建立早于番禺县学。几百年间,两地学宫均受战火与自然灾害侵袭,修缮频率较高。现存的番禺学宫与龙川学宫遗址皆兴建于17世纪中期。新中国成立后,二者先后得到大规模的修复。因历史源流及城市经济水平不同,二者的保护程度差异较为显著,番禺学宫明显优于龙川学宫。但二者在开发利用上面临着研究人员不足与文创开发落伍的共性问题,番禺学宫未充分开展区域合作与资源共享。龙川学宫新媒体宣传滞后。新时代下,二者应勠力探索既体现地方文化特色,又符合学宫自身资源性质的博物馆化利用方式。
The establishment of the Longchuan Confucian Temple predated the Panyu Confucian Temple. Over the centuries, both Confucian Temples in these two locations have been frequently damaged by warfare and natural disasters, leading to a high frequency of repairs. The existing sites of Panyu Confucian Temple and Longchuan Confucian Temple were both constructed in the mid-17th century. After the establishment of the People’s Republic of China, both sites underwent large-scale restoration. Due to differences in historical origins and urban economic levels, there are significant disparities in the degree of protection between the two, with the Panyu Confucian Temple clearly superior to the Longchuan Confucian Temple. However, both face common problems in insufficient research personnel and lagging cultural and creative product development. Panyu Confucian Temple has not fully engaged in regional cooperation and resource sharing, while Longchuan Confucian Temple’s new media promotion is lagging behind. In the new era, both should make efforts to explore museum-like utilization methods that not only embody local cultural characteristics but are also in line with the resource nature of the Confucian Temples themselves.
出处
《可持续发展》
2024年第4期868-875,共8页
Sustainable Development
