摘要
行政指导行为在2018年最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》的解释中被明确列举为不属于行政诉讼受案范围的行为,法院也在具体个案中对于如何判定行政指导行为予以回应。通过对判决的梳理,可以看到法官在审查时重点关注到行政行为的主体要素,职能要素,法律要素,其中不具有强制性,不对行政相对人的权利义务产生实际影响作为法院判定行政指导行为的主要考察因素。但是根据对判决的梳理却得出,一些行政指导行为虽然不具有强制性,但是相对人出于对政府的信任做出相应的行为导致权益遭受损害,大部分都无法通过司法审查的方式得到救济。以“不具有处分性”作为不可诉的行政指导行为的判定标准相较于“不具有强制性”作为判定标准而言,更符合立法原意并且符合当下行政争议的多元化解与实质性解决的要求。
In the 2018 Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, administrative guidance acts were clearly listed as acts that did not fall within the scope of administrative litigation, and courts also responded to how administrative guidance acts should be determined in specific cases. Through the combing of judgments, it can be seen that judges focus on the subject, functional and legal elements of administrative acts when reviewing, among which they are not mandatory and do not have an actual impact on the rights and obligations of administrative counterparts as the main factors for courts to judge administrative guidance acts. However, according to the combing of judgments, it is concluded that although some administrative guidance acts are not compulsory, the counterparty’s corresponding acts out of trust in the government cause damage to rights and interests, and most of them cannot be remedied through judicial review. Compared with “not compulsory” as the criterion for determining non-actionable administrative guidance acts, the criterion for “not having disposition” is more in line with the original legislative intent and meets the requirements of diversified resolu-tion and substantive resolution of current administrative disputes.
出处
《法学（汉斯）》
2023年第3期908-916,共9页
Open Journal of Legal Science
