期刊文献+

中文传媒并购智明星通的绩效分析

Corporate Performance Analysis of Chinese Media’s Acquisition of Zhimingxingtong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来并购活动如火如荼的进行着,由于互联网行业发展迅猛,许多企业将目光集中于此。但同时也出现了许多公司借壳上市、高杠杆收购等行为,公众对于高溢价并购有所警惕,甚至有人持有负面看法,高溢价收购真的是非理性的行为吗?对此,本文选取了具有代表性的高溢价并购案例——中文传媒并购智明星通进行分析。2014年中文传媒以26.6亿元的价格收购智明星通的100%的股权,当时有人质疑中文传媒估价过高,是非理性行为。如今并购已经过去了许多年,当年被质疑并购行为非理性的中文传媒企业绩效如何,是否其并购行为是非理性。本文通过研究中文传媒收购智明星通对公司经营前后所造成的影响,探讨中文传媒支付高溢价的合理性,希望能给各方提供一些参考。 M&A activity has been in full swing in the past years.Due to the rapid development of the Internet industry,many companies have focused their attention on this.However,there have also been many companies’backdoor listings and high leveraged acquisitions.The public is wary of high-value mergers and acquisitions.Some people even hold negative opinions.Is high-price acquisition really irrational?In this regard,this paper selects a representative high-value merger case—Chinese media mergers and acquisitions wisdom star through analysis.In 2014,Chinese Media acquired 100%of Zhimingxingtong’s equity at a price of 2.66 billion Yuan.At that time,some people questioned that the Chinese media was overvalued and irrational.M&A has been going on for many years now,when the performance of Chinese media companies that were questioned about irrational M&A behaviors was questioned,and whether their M&A activities were irrational.This paper explores the impact of Chinese media acquisition of Zhimingxingtong on the company’s business before and after the operation,and explores the rationality of Chinese media payment high premium,hoping to provide some reference for all parties.
作者 胡鹏 徐梅
出处 《金融》 2019年第5期498-508,共11页 Finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1Slusky A R, Caves R E. Synergy, agency and the deter- minants of premium paid in mergers[J]. Journal of In- dustrial Economics, 1991,39 (3) : 77-296. 被引量:1
  • 2朱宝宪.中国并购评论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2003. 被引量:2
  • 3Moeller T. Let's make a deal! How shareholders control impacts merger payoff[J]. Journal of Financial Econom- ics,2005,76(1) : 167-190. 被引量:1
  • 4Bargeron L L. Why do private acquirers pay so little compared to public acquirers? [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008,89 (3) : 375-390. 被引量:1
  • 5Chahine S, Ismai[ A. Premium merger fees and the choice of investment banks:a simultaneous analysis[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2009, 49(2) :159-177. 被引量:1
  • 6Wan K M,Wong K F. Economic impact of political bar- riers to cross-border acquisitions: an empirical study of CNOOCs unsuccessful takeover of Unocal[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2009,15 (4) : 447-468. 被引量:1
  • 7Rafael L P, Floreneio L, Andrei S, et al. Investor pro- tection and corporate valuation[J]. The Journal of Fi- nance,2002,57(3) :1147-1170. 被引量:1
  • 8David S, Stein J C. The dark side of internal capital markets: divisional rentseeking and inefficient invest ment[J]. Journal of Finance, 2000,55 (6) : 2537-2564. 被引量:1
  • 9Sten A, Kare L, Marcus L, et al. Biomathematics: mathematics of biostructures and biodynamics [M]. Elsevier Science B. V, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 10程敏.盈余管理行为对并购溢价影响的实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2009(1):106-111. 被引量:8

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部