摘要
《行政处罚法》第四十八条规定标准不明确所造成的法律问题,目前分析看来主要有三个:一为对于行政处罚决定公开应当定性为何种行为目前尚且存在不明确性;二是关于公开行政处罚案件的范围如何划定也存在问题,当前尚未对于“具有一定社会影响”的概念进行明确的界定,因此在确定哪些案件应该属于这一范畴时存在主观性和模糊性;三是行政处罚决定公开的内容也尚且没有明确的规定。为了解决这些法律问题,推进行政处罚决定公开制度建设,本文将围绕行政处罚决定的公开制度,首先讨论社会影响的性质,将其分为违法行为主体的社会影响和行政处罚信息的社会影响两个方面。并对行政处罚信息的不同种类进行深入分析,讨论如何确定社会影响的标准并权衡不同领域之间的差异,以推动更加透明和合理的执法实践。
Article 48 of the Administrative Penalties Law provides that the legal problems caused by the lack of clarity of the criteria are threefold: first, there is still a lack of clarity as to what kind of behaviour should be characterised as a public decision on administrative penalties;second, there is also a problem with how to delimit the scope of public cases of administrative penalties. The concept of “having a certain social impact” has not yet been clearly defined, so there is subjectivity and ambiguity in determining which cases should fall into this category;thirdly, there are no clear provisions on the content of the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions. In order to solve these legal problems and improve the setting of the public scope of administrative penalty decisions, this paper will focus on the public system of administrative penalty decisions, firstly discussing the nature of the social impact, which is divided into two aspects: the social impact of the subject of the offence and the social impact of the administrative penalty information. It will also conduct an in-depth analysis of the different types of administrative penalty information, discussing how to determine the criteria for social impact and weigh the differences between the different areas, in order to promote more transparent and rational law enforcement practices.
出处
《社会科学前沿》
2024年第5期207-213,共7页
Advances in Social Sciences
