期刊文献+

影响新型冠状病毒肺炎爆发期间集中隔离人员失眠的心理因素:基于优势分析的实证研究

Psychological Factors Affecting Insomnia among Individuals under Centralized Quarantine during the Outbreak of COVID-19: An Empirical Study Based on Dominance Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨影响新型冠状病毒肺炎爆发期间集中隔离人员失眠的心理因素,确定其相对重要性排序。方法:本研究采用失眠严重指数量表、抑郁症筛查量表和广泛性焦虑量表,对广东省湛江地区2022年新冠疫情期间4794名集中隔离人员进行问卷调查,并进行优势分析。结果:失眠、抑郁和焦虑的检出率分别为17.48%、14.41%和12.13%;失眠与抑郁和焦虑显著正相关(r=0.73;0.64;P Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the psychological factors influencing insomnia among individuals under centralized quarantine during the outbreak of COVID-19, and to deter-mine their relative importance. Method: This study used the Insomnia Severity Index, Depression Screening Scale, and Generalized Anxiety Scale to conduct a questionnaire survey on 4794 individ-uals under centralized quarantine in the western part of Guangdong province during the COVID-19 outbreak in 2022, and conducted a dominance analysis. Results: The prevalence rates of insomnia, depression, and anxiety were 17.48%, 14.41%, and 12.13%, respectively. Insomnia was signifi-cantly and positively correlated with depression and anxiety (r = 0.73;0.64;P < 0.001). According to the dominance analysis, the predictors of insomnia included gender, depression, and anxiety. In order of relative importance, the factors were depression (contribution rate: 59.04%), anxiety (contribution rate: 40.08%), and age (contribution rate: 0.83%). Furthermore, depression had more predictive power than anxiety and gender for insomnia incidence in quarantined individuals, and anxiety had more predictive power than age. Conclusions: The degree of insomnia among cen-tralized quarantine personnel is influenced by factors such as depression, anxiety, and gender.
出处 《心理学进展》 2023年第12期6001-6011,共11页 Advances in Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献62

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246 被引量:1
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55 被引量:1

共引文献1280

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部