期刊文献+

进化相关威胁刺激的注意偏向及记忆优势 被引量:1

Attentional Bias and Memory Dominance in Evolutionarily Related Threat Stimuli
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:本文旨在探究个体对于进化相关威胁刺激的注意偏向及其成分机制,以及个体是否存在对进化相关威胁刺激的记忆优势,进而讨论认知负荷是否会提高或降低个体的注意偏向。方法:研究点探测任务以及认知负荷两种条件下对于进化相关威胁刺激的注意偏向。结果:(1) 进化相关威胁刺激在一致条件下的反应时显著低于不一致条件;不一致条件下强和弱进化相关威胁刺激的反应时显著高于中性条件,一致条件下的反应时显著低于中性条件;(2) 被试对于弱进化相关威胁刺激的再认正确率显著高于强进化相关威胁刺激和中性刺激;(3) 认知负荷和无认知负荷条件下被试的反应时差异不显著,强和弱进化相关威胁刺激的注意反应时也不存在差异。结论:(1) 被试对强和弱进化相关威胁刺激具有明显的注意偏向,该注意偏向主要表现为注意解除困难;(2) 被试对弱进化相关威胁刺激存在高于强进化相关威胁刺激的记忆优势;(3) 认知负荷没有提高或降低个体的注意偏向,并且强和弱进化相关威胁刺激的注意偏向无显著差异。 Aim: The purpose of this paper is to explore the individual evolutionary threat to stimulate the attention of the bias and its composition mechanism, as well as the individual existence of evolutionary related threat to stimulate memory advantage, and discuss whether the cognitive load will increase or reduce a person’s attention. Methods: There are Research points under the mission for evolutionary threat boost attention bias and cognitive load conditions for evolutionary threat boost attention bias. Results: (1) The evolutionary threat stimulus in consistent under the condition of reaction was significantly lower than inconsistent conditions. The response time of the strong and weak evolutionarily related threat stimuli under the inconsistent condition was significantly higher than that under the neutral condition, and the response time under the consistent condition was significantly lower than that under the neutral condition. (2) The subjects’ recognition accuracy of weakly evolutionary-related threat stimuli was significantly higher than that of strongly evolutionary-related threat stimuli and neutral stimuli. (3) There was no significant difference in response time between subjects under cognitive load and without cognitive load, nor was there any difference in attention response time between strong and weak evolutionary-related threat stimuli. Conclusions: (1) The subjects have an obvious attention bias to the strong and weak evolutionarily related threat stimuli, which is mainly manifested as the difficulty of attention relief. (2) The subjects had a memory advantage over the strong evolutionary-related threat stimuli for the weak evolutionary-related threat stimuli. (3) Cognitive load did not increase or decrease the attention bias of individuals, and there was no significant difference between the attention bias of strong and weak evolutionarily related threat stimuli.
出处 《心理学进展》 2020年第6期845-859,共15页 Advances in Psychology
关键词 进化 威胁性刺激 注意偏向 认知负荷 Evolution Threatening Stimuli Attentional Bias The Cognitive Load
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献129

  • 1白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):719-722. 被引量:310
  • 2刘妹阳.(2013).生存加工的效应研究.河北师范大学硕士学位论文. 被引量:1
  • 3Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Qumterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1484 - 1504. 被引量:1
  • 4Buss, D. M. (2008). Evolu6onary psyehology: The new se, ienee of the mind. Boston: AUyn and Bacon. 被引量:1
  • 5Chapman, H. A., Johannes, K., Poppenk, J. L., Moscovitch, M., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Evidence for the differential salience of disgust and fear in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1100 - 1112. 被引量:1
  • 6Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research, Journal of Vend Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671 - 684. 被引量:1
  • 7Fox, E., Griggs, L., & Mouchlianitis, E. (2007). The detection of fear - relevant stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes?Emotion, 7(4), 691 - 696. 被引量:1
  • 8Genschow, O., Florack, A., & Wgnke, M. (2014). Recognition and approach responses toward threatening objects. SocialPsychology, 45(2), 86 - 92. 被引量:1
  • 9Isben, L. A. (2006). Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 1 - 35. 被引量:1
  • 10Kim, H. (2012). A dual - subsystem model of the brain's default network: Self - referential processing, memory retrieval processes, and autobiographical mcmtory retrieval. NeuroIrnage, 61(4), 966 - 977. 被引量:1

共引文献35

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部