摘要
萨拉·萨卡通过对不可再生资源和可再生资源进行大量数据和实证分析,反对资源短缺被理解为相对短缺,反对环境保护论者对可再生资源或新能源抱极乐观的态度,反对技术性的环境保护,来凸显和立住自己资源绝对短缺的观点。他在分析的过程中有可取之处,也有不足。可取之处是他分析资源是绝对短缺的意图明确,从意识上改变人们对资源抱有乐观的态度;分析方法合理,采用的是“破”和“立”的方法,更有说服力。不足之处在于他批评可再生资源消耗更多化石能源与提倡可再生资源利用存在阐述不清的问题,另外,只看到技术带来的负面影响而忽视了技术对社会的推动作用。
Through a large number of data and empirical analysis of non-renewable resources and renewable resources, Saral sarkar opposes the understanding of resource shortages as relative shortages, opposes environmentalists’ extremely optimistic attitude towards renewable resources or new energy sources, and opposes technical environmental protection to highlight and establish her own views on absolute shortage of resources. In the process of analysis, he has merits and shortcomings. It is desirable that his intention to analyze resources is absolutely scarce is clear, and to change people’s optimistic attitudes towards resources from a conscious point of view;the analysis method is reasonable, using a “broken” and “standing” approach, which is more convincing. The disadvantage is that he criticizes the problem of renewable resources consuming more fossil energy and advocating the use of renewable resources, and in addition, he only sees the negative impact of technology and ignores the role of technology in promoting society.
出处
《哲学进展》
2022年第3期308-312,共5页
Advances in Philosophy
