期刊文献+

CNKI中新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征高被引文献的计量分析

Bibliometric Analysis of the Highly Cited Literature on Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in CNKI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析CNKI数据库中新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)领域高被引文献的特征,为NRDS研究提供参考。方法:计算机检索中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI),来源类别为SCI来源期刊和北大核心,检索范围:期刊,检索时限为2006年1月至2022年11月,检索内容为篇名新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征高被引论文。以此为研究对象分析此类论文的发表年份、载文期刊、文献作者、作者机构、关键词、基金类别。结果:最终纳入178篇文献,被引文献158篇,高被引文献105篇,其中高被引文献于2013年最多,分布在36种期刊杂志上,其中中国当代儿科杂志的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征高被引文献数量、总被引频次排在第1位;论文具有多个作者合作的特点;作者机构中院校和医院排在前两位。 Objective: To analyze the characteristics of the highly cited literature of neonatal respiratory dis-tress syndrome (NRDS) in the CNKI database to provide a reference for NRDS research. Methods: Full-text database of Chinese Academic journals (CNKI), the source category was SCI source journals and Peking University core, the search scope: Journal, the search period was from January 2006 to November 2022, and the search content was highly cited papers with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Taking this paper as the research object, the publication year, publication journal, liter-ature author, author organization, key words and fund category of such papers are analyzed. Re-sults: 178 articles were included, 158 cited articles and 105 highly cited articles, among which the most were cited in 2013, distributed in 36 journals, among which the Chinese Journal of Contempo-rary Pediatrics ranks the first in terms of the number of highly cited publications and total citation frequency for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome;the paper had the characteristics of coopera-tion among multiple authors;colleges and hospitals ranked the top two.
作者 赵迪
出处 《临床医学进展》 2023年第9期14599-14605,共7页 Advances in Clinical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献50

  • 1邓睿,唐彬秩,刘华,屈艺,母得志.新生儿肺透明膜病发病及预后的高危因素分析[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2010,41(4):688-691. 被引量:16
  • 2COLE F J, Hulme E W. The history of comparative anatomy-A statistical analysis of the literature [ J]. Science Progress, 1917 ( 11 ) : 578 - 596. 被引量:1
  • 3Lotka A J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1926,16(12) :317 - 323. 被引量:1
  • 4Gross P L K, Gross E M. College libraries and chemical education [ J]. Science, 1927, 66 (1713) :385 -389. 被引量:1
  • 5Bradford S C. Sources of information on specific subjects[J].Engineering, 1934, 137 : 85 - 86. 被引量:1
  • 6Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas [ J ]. Science, 1955, 122 ( 3159 ) : 108 -111. 被引量:1
  • 7Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[ J]. The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102 ( 46 ) : 16569 - 16572. 被引量:1
  • 8Seglen O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research [ J ]. BMJ, 1997,314 (7079) :497 - 502. 被引量:1
  • 9Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[ J]. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science and Technology, 1973,24 (4) : 265 - 269. 被引量:1
  • 10Chen C. Generalised similarity analysis and pathfinder network scaling[ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 1998,10 (2) :107 -128. 被引量:1

共引文献616

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部