摘要
该文首先介绍多普勒效应、陈寿元效应的概念。然后讨论两种效应对天文信息的解释。通过对比,两种效应处理结果具有可比性。多普勒效应把宇宙红移处理成宇宙大爆炸,宇宙起源一点的爆炸。其结论比托勒密“宇宙围绕地球转”的更荒唐。陈寿元效应把宇宙红移处理成光波在太空长距离传播过程中,光波能量损耗,导致光波能量因子频率随传播距离的增加,有极其微弱的衰减,形成所谓的红移。红移实质上就是光谱频率向红的一端移动,就是频率降低。并且按指数规律衰减,一级近似,就是线性关系,与哈勃的观测定律一致,只是系数名称有区别。陈寿元效应导致宇宙红移的可能性远大于多普勒效应。其论据更符合现代科学,特别是通信科学、电磁学、物理科学。大家关心的是“陈寿元效应如果存在,以前为什么没有测量到”。由于效应太微弱,以往实验精度不够。采用多项实验设计新方法,水波、声波、电磁波的频率微弱衰减被测量到。结论将导致对大爆炸理论进行有科学依据的批判和否定。
This paper first introduces the concepts of Doppler Effect and Chen Shouyuan Effect.Then,the ex-planation of astronomical information by the two effects is discussed.Through comparison,the re-sults of the two effect treatments are comparable.The Doppler Effect treats the redshift of the un-iverse as a big bang,an explosion at a point where the universe originated.The conclusion is more absurd than Ptolemy's"the universe revolves around Earth".The Chen Shouyuan effect treats the redshift of the universe as the energy loss of light wave during the long-distance propagation of light wave in space,resulting in extremely weak attenuation of the frequency of light wave energy factor with the increase of the propagation distance,thus forming the so-called redshift.Redshift essentially means that the spectral frequency moves towards the red end,that is,the frequency de-creases.And decay according to exponential law,first-order approximation,is a linear relationship,consistent with Hubble’s observation law,but the name of the coefficient is different.The possibility of redshift of universe caused by Chen Shouyuan effect is much greater than Doppler Effect.Its arguments are more in line with modern science,especially communication science,electromag-netism and physics.Everyone is concerned about"if the Chen Shouyuan effect exists,why has it not been measured before".Because the effect is too weak,the precision of previous experiments is not enough.The weak attenuation of the frequencies of water waves,sound waves and electromagnetic waves is measured by adopting a new method of multi-experiment design.The conclusion will lead to scientific criticism and negation of the big bang theory.
出处
《天文与天体物理》
2019年第3期53-64,共12页
Astronomy and Astrophysics
