摘要
综合我国基本权利谱系、基本权利条款间的关系及立法意图,既不宜对言论作字面解释,将其含义限定为口头形式,同时也不宜作过分的扩充解释。我国《宪法》第35条意义上的言论,不仅包括口头形式,还应包括书面形式,但已成为基本权利或可以被其他基本权利条款所包摄的表达形式不在言论范畴。
Considering the system of basic rights, the relationship among the basic rights and the intention of legislator in China, the article 35 of the Constitution should be interpreted neither with the literal rule, nor by an excessively extensive method. Speech in article 35 of the Constitution includes written form, as well as oral form, excluding the expression forms that other articles have contained.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
2004年第3期22-26,共5页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
言论
论理解释
口头表达
书面表达
speech
golden rule
written expression
oral expression
