摘要
千变万化的犯罪态势与稳定、自治的刑事程序之间的冲突,是现代国家进入法治社会所普遍面临的难题。西方国家的实践经验是:在司法系统保持半自治半开放的状态下,政策与程序制度、规则进行良性互动,按照“轻轻重重”的刑事政策设计诉讼程序,以此维持司法制度在现代社会中的程序能力。这种刑事政策法律程序化的思路有其独到价值,同时也难免产生另外的弊端。笔者在尽可能客观分析的基础上,就政策与程序的互动在我国的必要性与可能性作了初步探讨,尤其关注了“严打”程序化问题,以期从程序法的视角找出拥有正当性的犯罪治理模式。
The conflict between the changing crime state and stable,autonomous criminal procedure, is the universal problem for the countries when they come into society under the rule of law. The situation needs flexible administrative policy, but modern society under the rule of law observes the clichéof regulation by rules. In order to avoid the crisis of procedural legitimacy rooted in this contradiction, the west countries' practice is, under the judicial system in a semi-autonomous and semi-open state, to achieve the beneficial interaction among policy, procedural institutions and the rules so as to guarantee the judicial capability in the modern society and hereby design the procedure according to the criminal policy of “treating petty misdemeanor with more alleviative disposition and treating felony with more severe sanction”. The way that crimminal policy is absorbed into the procedural designation has its original value, at the same time it is difficult to avoid bringing other malpractices. From an objective angle,the author discusses primarily the necessity and possibility of intercourse between policy and procedure, especially focuses on how to bring “crackdown”into proceedings. The purpose is to find out legitimate crime control model in the context of procedural law.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期109-116,共8页
Political Science and Law
