摘要
黄宗羲反对《春秋》一字褒贬说,提出《春秋》取材于列国之史,并不局限于鲁史,并指出其有脱简与错误,从而还《春秋》以史的面目。他对《春秋胡氏传》进行了批判,指出其被义例束缚了,并多处违背经文。他还结合历法研究了一些具体问题。
Huang zongxi opposed to the view that Spring and Autumn Annals praised or criticized with a single word,he put forward that Spring and Autumn Annals draw materials from the historical records of different states,which didn't confine to the historical records of Lu State.He pointed out it had many words dropped and mistakes.Spring and Autumn Annals was returned to the original condition of historical records.He criticized Hu anguo's commentaries on Spring and Autumn Annals,pointed out that it was bind up by the outline or scope of the book,and it run counter to the Confucian canon.He also researched some specific problems by way of calendar.
出处
《赣南师范学院学报》
2004年第2期67-70,共4页
Journal of Gannan Teachers' College(Social Science(2))
关键词
黄宗羲
《春秋》
《春秋胡氏传》
历法
huang zongxi
Spring and Autumn Annals
Hu anguo's commentaries on Spring and Autumn Annals
calendar
