期刊文献+

新归纳之谜的概念空间方案 被引量:1

Conceptual Space Solution to the New Riddle of Induction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新归纳之谜是古德曼对休谟归纳问题的确证式划归。它的内涵是似律性假说和偶似假说的区分问题。伽登佛斯的概念空间方案试图以凸性规则为可投射性的标准,进而达到区分似律性假说和偶似假说的目的。但本文表明,凸性规则既不是可投射性的充分条件也不是它的必要条件,因而概念空间方案并未解决新归纳之谜。 The new riddle of induction is a kind of confirmationary reduction for the induction problem that Nelson Goodman does. The connotation of the riddle is what distinguishes lawlike hypotheses from accidental ones. In his conceptuardenfors regards convexity rule as the criterion of projectibility, and uses it to distinguish lawlike hypotheses from accidental ones. But I will show that the convexity rule is neither a sufficient condition nor a necessary condition. So the conceptual space solution can't solve the new riddle of induction.
作者 顿新国
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第3期54-58,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金项目"当代西方逻辑哲学最新成就研究"(编号D3BZX043)
关键词 新归纳之谜 概念空间 可投射性 凸性规则 绿蓝问题 the new riddle of induction conceptual space convexity rule projectibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Nelson Goodman.Fact,Fiction and Forecast[M].Gambndger Harvard University,1983.74,75,75,73,80,81,65,73,120,80. 被引量:1
  • 2Thomson J J.Grue [J].Journal of Philosophy,1966(63).289—309. 被引量:1
  • 3陈晓平..归纳逻辑与归纳悖论[M],1994.
  • 4张志林著..因果观念与休谟问题[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1998:323.
  • 5卡尔·波普尔.客观知识[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2001.7—9. 被引量:4
  • 6W V Quine.Natural Kinds[A].In Doughs Stalker(ed.) Grne[C].Open Court,1994.42—55. 被引量:1
  • 7Peter Ggrdenfors.Induction,Conceptual Spaces,and AI[A]In Doughs Stalker(ed.)Gruc[C].Open Gourt,1994.117.122,124,126,129. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献14

  • 1顿新国.绿蓝问题与简单性方案[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(10):44-47. 被引量:4
  • 2顿新国.从绿蓝问题看波普尔对归纳问题的解决[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,29(2):31-35. 被引量:1
  • 3Catherine Z.Elgin.Nelson Goodman's New Rid- dle of Induction.New York&London:Garland Publishing, INC,1997.xi. 被引量:1
  • 4Jean Nicod.Foundation of Geometry and Induction. London:Routledge, 1930.219. 被引量:1
  • 5Nelson Goodman.Fact,Fiction,and Forecast.Cambridge:Harvard University, 1983.74,83,94. 被引量:1
  • 6Rarm Israel.Two interpretations of" grue" - or how to misunderstand the new riddle of induction. [J] Analysis, 64.4,2004,337. 被引量:1
  • 7S.F.Barker & Peter Achinstein,On the New Riddle of Induction.In Nelson Goodman's New R.iddle of Induction.New York:Garland Publishing,Inc, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 8Joseph UUian.More on "Grue" and Grue [J]. Philosophical Review, LXLX(1960), 511. 被引量:1
  • 9Joseph UUian.Luck,License,and Lingo [A].In Grue! The New Riddle of Induction[C],Chicago:Open Court, 1994,37,39. 被引量:1
  • 10W.V.Quine.Natural Kinds [ A ] .in Grue! The New Riddle of Induction [C ], Chicago:Open Court, 1994,42,48,49. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部