摘要
哲学解释学对文本意义的本体论诠释使其招致相对主义的责备。伽达默尔为规避相对主义而采取的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。争论表明,确定客观性问题讨论的视域是值得关注的一个问题。客观性问题本质上不是事物的存在性问题,而是精神活动及其成果的意义评价问题。
Philosophic exegetics invited attacks from relativism because of its ontological interpretation of the meaning of text. In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher. The argument shows it is a worthwhile issue to determine the vision of a discussion concerning objectivity. For objectivity is in essence not an issue concerning the existentiality of things but one concerning spiritual activity and the meaning of its results.
出处
《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第1期97-101,共5页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
