CP定律的解释及其经济学起源

The Interpretations of Ceteris Paribus Laws and Their Origins from Economics

下载PDF

导出

摘要 CP定律是近些年来在科学哲学等领域十分火热且具争议性的课题,已发展出多种解释理论,然而它在学术领域的起源却是经济学领域,本文首先对CP定律的不同研究分支进行梳理,之后在经济学领域追本溯源,并寻找这些研究分支的思想根源。

作者张立英

机构地区中央财经大学现代逻辑研究所

出处《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第S1期73-76,共4页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics

基金北京高等学校青年英才计划项目国家留学基金网留学回国人员科研启动基金中央财经大学学院科研支持计划基础学科科研扶持计划

关键词 CP定律其他情况均同正常的经济学

参考文献13

1Fodor,J.You Can Fool Some of the People All of the Time,Everything Else Being Equal:Hedged laws. Mind . 1991 被引量：1
2A.Reutlinger,G.Schurz,A.Hüttemann.'Ceteris paribus laws'. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . 2014 被引量：1
3Gerhard Schurz.What is 'normal’’? An evolution-theoretic foundation for normic laws and their relation to statistical normality. Philos. Sci . 2001 被引量：1
4Paul Pietroski,Georges Rey.When other things aren’t equal: Saving {\it ceteris paribus} laws from vacuity. Br. J. Philos. Sci . 1995 被引量：1
5John Earman,John Roberts.??CETERIS PARIBUS, THERE IS NO PROBLEM OF PROVISOS(J)Synthese . 1999 (3) 被引量：1
6Marc Lange.??Who’s Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them(J)Erkenntnis . 2002 (3) 被引量：1
7Wolfgang Spohn.??Laws, Ceteris Paribus Conditions, and the Dynamics of Belief(J)Erkenntnis . 2002 (3) 被引量：1
8John Earman,John T. Roberts,Sheldon Smith.??Ceteris Paribus Post(J)Erkenntnis . 2002 (3) 被引量：1
9JamesWoodward,ChristopherHitchcock.??Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account(J). 2003 (1) 被引量：1
10Johan Benthem,Patrick Girard,Olivier Roy.??Everything Else Being Equal: A Modal Logic for Ceteris Paribus Preferences(J)Journal of Philosophical Logic . 2009 (1) 被引量：1

1Earman, J. et al. Editorial. In: Earman, J. et al eds. Ceteris Paribus Laws [C].Norwell, MA& Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 21302. 被引量：1
2Earman, J., Roberts, J., and Smith, S. Ceteris Paribus Lost. In: Earman, J. et al eds. Ceteris Paribus Laws [C]. Norwell, MAt & Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. 被引量：1
3Lange, M.Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos [J]. Erkenntnis. 38, 1993. 被引量：1
4Elgin, M. and Sober, M. Cartwright on Explanation and Idealization. In: Earman, J. et al eds. Ceteris Par/bus Laws[C]. Norwell, MA & Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:165 - 174. 被引量：1
5Ramsey, F. Foundations of Mathematics [M]. Atlantic Highland, NJ: Humanities Press, 1978. 被引量：1
6Lewis, D. Counterfactuals. [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973. 被引量：1
7Earman, J. Laws of Nature. In: Balashov, Y. and Rosenberg A. eds. Philosophy of Science Contemporary Readings [ C]. London & New York: Routledge, 2002. 被引量：1
8Cartwright, N. The Dappled World [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 被引量：1
9Kuhn, T. Mathematical'versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science. In: Essential Tension [ M]. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1977. 被引量：1
10Cartwright N. How the Laws of Physics Lie[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983. 被引量：1

中央财经大学学报

2015年第S1期

内容加载中请稍等...