摘要
2015年的《民诉法解释》第一百一十条作为新增条文对于实现和发挥当事人陈述的证明价值与功能具有重要理论意义,为考察其实务中具体适用情况而对相关裁判文书进行统计、分析,得出的比较、验证结果出乎意料,除具体操作应用混乱之外,该项新生制度也面临"虚化"或"淡化"的危险,故于总结实务经验基础之上晾出部分问题,并得出相应对策。
As a new provision,the 110 th article of the 'Judicial Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law'has considerable theoretical significance for the realization of the value and function of the statement of the parties. In order to investigate the practical application of the law,relevant judgment documents are gathered for analysis. Through comparison and verification,it is unexpectedly found that,apart from the operation chaos in application,the new regulation also faces the danger of 'impracticality 'or 'weakening '. So,on the basis of summing up practical experience,some corresponding countermeasures are proposed to solve the problems.
出处
《华中师范大学研究生学报》
2016年第3期35-39,共5页
Central China Normal University Journal of Postgraduates
关键词
当事人陈述
操作混乱
虚化危险
statement of the parties concerned
operation chaos
danger of impracticality
