摘要
以物抵债,系当事人在合同中之约定,应区分不同类型对其性质加以分析认定并尽量与我国现有的民法制度相匹配。以物抵债应从时间及物权变动上区分为四种类型,对协议效力的判断,应从意思自治及鼓励交易原则出发,在正确对合同和法律进行解释的前提下肯定其效力,而不是简单的适用流质契约、让与担保及代物清偿等规则。预防可能存在的虚假诉讼,应对原债权债务关系加以审查,使本属于法院的义务回归其位,并辅之以不动产登记制度及预告登记制度加以解决。
Debt Payment in Property is an agreement agreed by parties in the contract,which should be distinguished by different types to identify its nature and to match with current civil law system of our country. Judging the validity of Debt Payment in Property should base on the principle of autonomy and encourage trading and under the premise of correct interpretation of contract and law to affirm its effectiveness rather than simple applying the rules of transferring guarantee fluidity contract and substitute discharge. To avoid the possible fraud litigation,we should review the original debtor- creditor relationship and let the court obey its own obligation,by offering the registration system of real property and the advance registration system.
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2015年第6期131-136,共6页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
以物抵债
审委会纪要
流质契约
让与担保
Debt Payment in Property
Meeting Summary
Fluidity Contract
Transferring Guarantee
