期刊文献+

中美行政程序证据制度比较研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study of Administrative Procedure Evidence System between China and America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "正义不仅要实现,而且要以看得见的方式实现"——程序正是运送正义的方式。行政证据制度作为行政程序制度的重要内容,其区别于行政诉讼证据制度。然而实践中行政机关工作人员混淆二者,在行政执法中以行政诉讼证据规则代替行政证据规则的情况屡见不鲜。这无论对于行政行为的合法性还是行政行为的效率原则都产生了非常不利的影响,故建立独立的、符合行政程序特点的行政证据规则就显得至关重要。美国在行政程序证据制度方面的一些特点是值得借鉴的,通过中美之间的比较,吸收其精华,构建中国完善的行政程序证据制度是有必要的。 "Justice not only must be achieved,but also in a visible way"—— Procedure is the way which delivers justice.Administrative evidence system is an important part of the system of administrative procedures which is different from administrative litigation system.However,the executive staff confuses them in practice.In the administrative enforcement,they often use rules of evidence in administrative proceedings instead of administrative rules of evidence,which have had a very negative impact on the legality of administrative action or the principle of efficiency of administrative action.So,Establishing administrative rules of evidence,independent and consistent with the characteristics of administrative procedures,is particularly important.Evidence in the administrative procedure system in USA some of whose characteristics is worth learning,through comparisons between the United States and China,absorbing its essence and building evidence in China to improve the system of administrative procedures is necessary.
作者 李祎
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》 2010年第3期135-140,共6页 Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词 行政程序 证据规则 行政证据 Administrative Procedures Rules of Evidence Administrative Evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

共引文献176

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部