摘要
目的比较微创穿刺引流术与内科保守治疗老年人高血压脑出血的临床治疗效果。方法选择60例高血压脑出血的老年患者进行本临床研究,随机分为微创穿刺引流术组30例和内科保守治疗组30例;分别进行微创穿刺引流术与内科保守治疗,观察其临床治疗效果。结果微创穿刺引流术组治愈率(73.33%)明显高于内科保守治疗组(30.0%)(P【0.05);微创穿刺引流术组显效以上率(93.33%)明显高于内科保守治疗组(73.33%)(P【0.01)。结论微创穿刺引流术治疗老年人高血压脑出血较内科保守治疗疗效好。
Objective To compare the clinical treatment effect of minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage and conservative medical management on the elderly people with hypertensive cererbral. Methods Sixty elderly patients with hypertensive cererbral in this study,and were randomly selected into minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage group and conservative medical management group ( 30 subjects in each group) . The two groups then receive minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage or conservative medical management respectively. The clinical treatment effects were observed. Results The cure rate of minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage group was 73. 33% which was significantly higher than that of conservative medical management group ( 30% ) ( P < 0. 05) ; The overall effective rate of minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage group ( 93. 33% ) was also significantly higher than that of conservative medical management group ( 30%) ( P <0.01) . Conclusion The treatment effect of minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage on the elderly people with hypertensive cererbral was obviously better than that conservative medical management.
出处
《中国保健营养（下半月）》
2012年第6期1749-1750,共2页
China Health Care & Nutrition
关键词
微创穿刺引流术
内科治疗
高血压脑出血
Minimally invasive surgery of puncture and drainage
Medical treatment
Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage
