摘要
学术英语口头演讲是研究生应具备的能力之一。传统的英语口头演讲基本以教师评价为主,学习者的观点并没有纳入评价系统之中。本研究收集了300名具有理工科背景的研究生学术口头演讲的同伴反馈数据,从学习者的角度总结了学术口头演讲的评价要素。数据统计结果发现:学习者评价标准的第一标准是口头演讲的可理解性,即同伴是否能听懂对方的口头报告内容,其他评价要素依次为:流利度、发音、视频辅助工具的使用、观众的眼神交流、提问回答环节和台风。除评价外,评价者还从语法、语音语调和台风方面给予同伴具体的建议。
Assessment of oral presentations is an under-explored area.Traditional assessment is mainly performed by teachers only while students’views are not taken into consideration.This study investigates 300 science students’peer feedback and generalizes major factors influencing students’evaluation of their peers’presentations.Results show that intelligibility is the number one factor in the peer assessments.Other factors include fluency,pronunciation,the use of visual aids,eye contact,performances in the Q&A session and the stage manner.In addition,it is found that students also made specific suggestions on the improvement of their grammar,pronunciation and manners of delivery.
出处
《中国ESP研究》
2016年第1期136-144,162,共10页
Chinese Journal of ESP
基金
江苏省外国语言学会“基于网络化、智能化的外语教学创新研究课题”立项项目“研究生学术英语口语微课课程开发与应用研究”的阶段性成果
关键词
同伴反馈
学术口头演讲
评价标准
peer feedback
academic oral presentation
assessment criteria
