摘要
两大法系的裁判文书均重视理由的阐述,但又呈现出各自的特点;我国裁判文书理由存在诸多缺陷;兼容、借鉴两大法系的特点,走“第三种模式”是裁判文书改革的需要。
Both of the two major legal stystems pay attention to the statement of reasons about judge documents,but they have their different features.In our country the judge documents have many disadvantages.It is necessary to reform our mode by inclusiving and using for reference the features of the two legal systems,that is,by choosing the third mode.
出处
《河南社会科学》
2003年第3期84-86,共3页
Henan Social Sciences
