期刊文献+

一次性包皮环切吻合器、商环及传统包皮环切术疗效比较 被引量:6

Effect comparison of Disposable Circumcision Suture Device,ShangRing and Circumcision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较一次性包皮环切吻合器与商环及传统包皮环切术疗效比较。方法:将90例患者随机分为3组,传统包皮环切组、商环组及一次性环切吻合组(DCSD)。评估指标包括手术时间、失血量、术中疼痛评分、术后疼痛评分,术后疼痛持续时间、术后换药次数、术后水肿、切口裂开、术后出血、术后血中、术后再次手术、术后感染、愈合天数、术后瘢痕、术后粘连、阴茎外观满意评分、总体满意评分、费用情况等。结果:商环组及DCSD组术中失血量及手术时间显著低于传统组(P<0.001);DCSD组术中疼痛低于传统组及商环组(P<0.001);传统组术后疼痛高于其他两组(P<0.001);DCSD组及商环组对阴茎外观的满意度高于传统组(P<0.05);总体满意度DCSD组高于商环组及传统组(P<0.05)。结论:使用DCSD可以缩短手术时间及切口愈合时间,减轻术中术后疼痛,降低术后感染、术后瘢痕及术后粘连出现,提高患者对阴茎外观满意度及手术总体满意度。 Objective:To compare the effects of disposable circumcision suture device,Shangring and circumcision.Methods:90patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: circumcision group,ShangRing group and disposable circumcision suture device(DCSD) group. Evaluation indicators included:operation time,blood loss,intraoperative pain score,postoperative pain score,the pain duration of postoperative,postoperative treatment,postoperative edema,incision dehiscence,postoperative bleeding,postoperative blood,reoperation after operation,postoperative infection,healing days,postoperative scar,postoperative adhesion,satisfactory evaluation of penis appearance,overall satisfactory evaluation,cost,etc.Results:Intraoperative blood loss and operation time of ShangRing group and DCSD group were all lower than that of circumcision group(P0.001).Intraoperative pain of DCSD group was less than that of circumcision group and ShangRing group(P0.001).The postoperative pain of circumcision group was higher than that of the other two groups(P0.001).The appearance satisfaction of penile of DCSD group and ShangRing was higher than that of the circumcision group(P0.05).The overall satisfaction of DCSD group was higher than that of ShangRing group and circumcision group(P0.05).Conclusion:DCSD can shorten the operation time and healing time,reduce intraoperative and postoperative pain,and reduce the postoperative infection and postoperative scar and postoperative adhesion,which can improve patients?appearance satisfaction of penile and overall satisfaction.
出处 《中国社区医师(医学专业)》 2014年第25期72-74,共3页
关键词 一次性包皮环切吻合器 商环 包皮环切术 患者满意度 阴茎外观 Disposable Circumcision Suture Device ShangRing Circumcision Patient satisfaction Appearance of the penis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1肖二龙,丁辉,李永前,王志平.商环包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术治疗包皮过长或包茎的Meta分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2013,19(10):935-939. 被引量:20
  • 2张万峰,陆平,宫关,王贵平,曲嘉林,刘会恩,丁晓晖,王百峰,王洪杰.包皮环切术前后包皮中触觉小体与早泄的相关性[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2009,14(3):206-208. 被引量:37
  • 3吕年青,李石华,黄翼然.中国的男性包皮环切术与艾滋病预防[J].中华男科学杂志,2008,14(3):195-196. 被引量:90
  • 4Yutaro Hayashi,Kenjiro Kohri.Circumcision related to urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, human immunodeficiency virus infections, and penile and cervical cancer[J].Int J Urol.2013(8) 被引量:1
  • 5Cheng Yue,Yan Ze-jun,Ke-rong Wu,Xin-jun Su,Jia-sheng Hu,Jian-wei Ma,Chuan-min Guo,Hai-wei Fang,Rui Su,Yao Zhang,Qing-hua Zhang.A Randomized Clinical Study of Circumcision with a Ring Device Versus Conventional Circumcision[J].The Journal of Urology.2012(5) 被引量:1
  • 6Pius Musau,Mustafa Demirelli,Nicholas Muraguri,Francis Ndwiga,Daniel Wainaina,Nabila Amin Ali.The Safety Profile and Acceptability of a Disposable Male Circumcision Device in Kenyan Men Undergoing Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision[J].The Journal of Urology.2011(5) 被引量:1
  • 7Theobald Hategekimana,Jean Paul Bitega,Muyenzi Leon Ngeruka,Anita Asiimwe,Agnes Binagwaho.598 NATIONAL SAFETY AND EFFICACY STUDY OF PREPEX, A NEW DEVICE FACILITATING NON-SURGICAL, BLOODLESS CIRCUMCISION WITH NO ANESTHESIA AND NO SUTURES, FOR RESOURCE LIMITED SETTINGS[J].The Journal of Urology.2011(4) 被引量:1
  • 8Taha Hirbod,Robert C. Bailey,Kawango Agot,Stephen Moses,Jeckoniah Ndinya-Achola,Ruth Murugu,Jan Andersson,Jakob Nilsson,Kristina Broliden.Abundant Expression of HIV Target Cells and C-Type Lectin Receptors in the Foreskin Tissue of Young Kenyan Men[J].The American Journal of Pathology.2010(6) 被引量:1

二级参考文献18

共引文献125

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部