摘要
老子的"道"与柏拉图的"理式"是他们思想的内核,两者存在很多相似性,均先验自足,同为万物之源,且都绝对永恒。但是两者的差异也是显而易见的,"道"是动中有静,是一个完整体;而"理式"却是静中有动,可以被分有。造成"道"与"理式"异同的原因乃由于落脚点不同:老子的思想体现了对民间疾苦的关怀,而柏拉图则旨在维护贵族阶级。
Lao Tzu,s "Tao" and Plato’s "Idea" are the inner cores of their thinking and there are many similarities between them. "Tao" and "Idea", transcendental and self-sufficiency, are not only the source of all things, but also are absolutely everlasting. But the differences between them are obvious: "Tao" is moving in a static and a complete whole, while "Idea" is static in action, which can be divided into parts. The author holds that the differences result from their different standpoints, as Lao Tzu’s thinking reflects the care for the sufferings of the people, whereas Plato’s thought is aimed at maintaining the favors of the aristocracy.
出处
《外语艺术教育研究》
2014年第3期58-62,共5页
Educational Research on Foreign Languages and Arts
关键词
道
理式
老子
柏拉图
永恒
贵族阶级
"Tao"
"Idea"
Lao Tzu
Plato
everlasting
the aristocracy
