摘要
作为现代国家治理的一种重要方式,私人干预义务本质上是一种干预行政的公私协力模式,首先应当以效率为正当性基础,同时符合行政任务可转移与公权力国家独占的宪法要求,并保留国家的履行责任。其次,由于私人干预义务是一种强制协力,只有对秩序危害具有相当控制力的第三人,才能被立法拟制为对他人行为负责的义务人。最后,基于公共利益而要求私人承担的义务应当是有限的,要经受形式合法性与实质合法性的检验。网络时代,私人干预义务的适用呈现日益泛化的趋势,网络群组管理责任即属典型。公私协力是网络行政法的基本特征,既要积极引入私人参与网络治理,又要明晰治理主体责任构成的规范要件,审慎对待私人干预义务的创制,避免私人义务过重与国家行政责任逃逸。
As an important form of modern state governance,the obligation of private intervention is essentially a mode of public-private cooperation that interferes with the administration. First,efficiency should be used as the basis for legitimacy,and at the same time,it should be consistent with the constitutional requirements that the administrative tasks can be transferred and the state’s public power can not be transferred. Retain the country’s performance responsibilities. Second,since the obligation of private intervention is a kind of coercive force,only one third person who has considerable control over the harm to the order can be legislated to be an obligor responsible for the actions of others. Finally,the obligations that are required of private individuals based on public interests should be limited and subject to formal and substantive legitimacy. In the Internet era,the application of private intervention obligations has become increasingly generalized,and network group management responsibilities are typical. Public-private partnership is the basic feature of network administrative law. It is necessary to actively introduce private participation in network governance,clarify the regulatory elements of the responsibility of governance entities,treat the creation of private intervention obligations prudently,and avoid excessive private obligations and the escape of state administrative responsibilities.
出处
《网络信息法学研究》
2018年第1期83-102,310,共21页
Journal of Cyber and Information Law
基金
国家社科基金项目(17BFX004)
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(17SFB3012)
江苏省社会科学基金课题(17FXC002)的阶段性成果
关键词
私人干预义务
公私协力
网络治理
行政法义务
群主责任
Private Intervention Obligations
Public-Private Partnerships
Network Governance
Obligations of Administrative Law
