摘要
强制转移权的设定条款违反了法律保留原则,也没有构建合理的权力制约机制。从内涵看,强制转移权是应急性警察行政权,强制转移行为是应急性行政强制行为。强制转移权的合法性依据不仅包括《突发事件应对法》,还应包括《行政强制法》。为此,应重新解读《行政强制法》第3条第2款,将无法律依据的应急强制行为纳入其规制范围。在此基础上,应借鉴西方先进经验,并基于我国实际情况构建相关法律制度:一方面,完善地方法律法规,明确强制转移权行使的前提和主体;另一方面,构建基于《行政强制法》的强制转移权执行机制,建立合理的执行程序和强制力"阶梯",从而实现对强制转移权的法律规制。
The legal clause which established the power of mandatory evacuation had been conflicted with the principle of reservation of law,and had not built a rational power-controlling system.From the perspective of intension,the power of mandatory evacuation belongs to the police powers,and the related action is a kind of administrative compulsory measures.The legitimate grounds of the power are both the Emergency Response Law and Administrative Compulsion Law.Hence,the Section 2Article 3of Administrative Compulsion Law should be reconstructed and should include the emergency compulsory actions without legal grounds.Based on this,while drawing the lessons from western countries,the Chinese related legal system should be improved from two aspects:On one hand,the local laws and regulations should be changed to clarified the preconditions and administrative subjects during the process of mandatory evacuation;On the other hand,Administrative Compulsion Law should be used to restrict the way the power may adopt to establish the rational enforcing procedures and the'stage'of compulsory force,and the ultimate goal of this is to realize the legal governance of the power of mandatory evacuation.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2016年第4期642-649,共8页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
强制转移权
法律保留原则
《行政强制法》
强制力“阶梯”
power of mandatory evacuation
principle of reservation of law
Administrative Compulsion Law
'stage'of compulsory force
