摘要
由于存在不同法律传统和诉讼结构,两大法系国家之间证据开示制度存在较大差异,使跨国民事诉讼产生了冲突。国际社会为了推动各国民事诉讼程序及证据开示规则的统一,海牙国际私法学会、国际律师协会以及欧盟等都先后制定过一些涉及国际民事诉讼程序的公约、示范规则等,但产生的效果十分有限。在美国法学会与国际统一私法协会的联合努力下,2004年《跨国民事诉讼原则》得以通过。《跨国民事诉讼原则》对证据开示作了较为详细的规定,尽管其内容还存在有待完善的地方,但是其必将对各国立法带来影响,推动国际民事诉讼规则的协调与统一。《跨国民事诉讼原则》对我国完善相关立法,也有一些有益的启示。
Due to different legal tradition and procedure structure,there are conflict between the civil law countries and the common law countries in discovery.In order to harmonize the civil procedure and discovery rules in different countries,International community have taken many measures.The Hague conference on private international law,International Bar Association and the European Union have developed some international civil procedure Conventions,however,the effect is very limited.Under the joint efforts of the American Law Society and International Institute for the Unification of Private Law,the principle of transnational civil procedure was passed in 2004.The Principles of transnational civil procedure formulated detailed provisions for discovery.Although the Principles of transnational civil procedure need to be perfected,it will impact national legislations in the future,promote the Unification of international civil procedure rules.The principle of transnational civil procedure is also helpful to improve the relevant legislations in China.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
CSSCI
2015年第2期84-104,共21页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金《国际民商事司法协助条约在我国实施实证研究》(项目批准号:10YJC820087)的阶段性成果
关键词
跨国
民事诉讼
证据开示
transnational
civil procedure
discovery
