摘要
当事人和仲裁庭很大程度上决定着国际商事仲裁中的证据规则,但是通常要遵守仲裁程序准据法的强制性规则尤其是正当程序要求。当事人和仲裁庭对证据规则的确定与适用直接影响到国际商事仲裁的价值与目标的实现。国内证据法是否以及如何适用于国际商事仲裁也取决于当事人或仲裁庭的选择。不过,由于价值取向以及仲裁参与人法律文化背景多元化等原因,国内证据法一般不宜严格适用于国际商事仲裁。事实上,各国国际商事仲裁中证据规则的适用出现了不同法律文化的融合趋势。以《IBA证据规则》为代表的仲裁证据软法体现了这种文化融合,它可以灵活适用于国际商事仲裁,,在国际实践中也发挥着不可忽视的规范作用。总之,尽管未能完全摆脱仲裁地法的影响,但各国国际商事仲裁证据规则的确定与适用之实践整体上呈现出"国际化"趋势。相比之下,我国国际商事仲裁的相关实践具有浓厚的"诉讼化"和"本地化"色彩,我国仲裁界应针对其中的原因,相应地采取对策。
The parties and tribunal determines the evidentiary rules to large extent in international commercial arbitration proceedings,only subject to mandatory rules of applicable procedural law,especially the due process requirement,and their choice influences directly the realization of values and goals of international commercial arbitration.Whether national evidence law is applicable in the arbitration also rest with the parties or the tribunal,but it’s not advisable to apply it strictly commonly due to the nature of arbitration and the diversity of parties’ legal backgrounds.In fact,the harmonization of legal cultures in the practices of international becomes a tendency,which is reflected in IBA rules of evidence and other international soft law.In summary,the determination and application of evidentiary rules in international commercial arbitration become internationalized,although it can’t be free from lex loci arbitri completely.In contrast,the judicialization and localization exist widely in determining and applying of evidentiary rules in Chinese international arbitration,thus countermeasures should be taken.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
CSSCI
2013年第1期279-304,共26页
Wuhan University International Law Review
