摘要
2009年2月3日,国际法院对罗马尼亚诉乌克兰一案作出判决。按照该判决,双方存在争议的海域大约80%部分归属于罗马尼亚所有,同时界定蛇岛为礁石而非岛屿,不享有大陆架和专属经济区。在该案中,国际法院适用公平原则进行判案时明确提出了划界"三阶段论",这反映了公平原则及相关情况规则成为崭新的一般习惯法。在相关情况规则中,当事国对争议区域的实际控制措施日益得到国际法院重视并赋予其效力。我国在解决与相关国家的划界争端时应始终坚持1982年《联合国海洋公约》有关条款所赋予的权利基础,同时亦应密切关注海域划界规则的新发展。
February 3,2009,the International Court of Justice issued its judgment in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v.Ukraine).According to the judgment,a disputed area of approximately 80% belonged to Romania,and that ICJ concluded that Serpents’ Island is a rock,rather than an island,and it has no exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.In this case,the Court applied the principle of equity.Moreover,it put forward"three-stage theory"in process of demarcation.It reflects that the equitable principles/relevant circumstances rule is regarded as a new rule of general customary law.At the same time,the International Court of Justice increasingly attaches importance to effective control on disputed areas.China should always adhere to related provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,which provide the basis of title for maritime delimitation,and should also pay close attention to the tendency towards the rules of maritime delimitation.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
CSSCI
2010年第2期392-412,共21页
Wuhan University International Law Review
关键词
海洋划界
公平原则及相关情况规则
实际控制
maritime
delimitation
equitable
principles/relevant
circumstances rule
actual
control
