摘要
符号政治经济学批判是鲍德里亚早期思想建构中的重要内容,也是他分析消费社会的理论平台。鲍德里亚认为,使用价值与交换价值的区分同符号的能指与所指的区分具有理论的同质性,在消费社会中,能指与所指的区分构成了现代资本主义合法性的前提。这决定了马克思的政治经济学批判只有发展为符号政治经济学批判,才能揭示消费过程中意识形态的产生过程。也正是在这一思考中,鲍德里亚离开了马克思,经过《生产之镜》转向后马克思思潮。
Critique of the political economy of the sign is a key part of Baudrillard' s early theories and a theoretic platform to analyze the consuming society as well. He holds that the difference between use value and exchange value has a theoretic homogeneity with that of signifier and signified of the sign, which is a prerequisite to the legality of modern capitalism in the consuming society. Therefore, only by developing Marx' s critique of the political economy into that of the political economy of the sign, can the formation of the ideology in consumption be exposed. That' s also why Baudrillard left Marx and turned to post -Marxism after he wrote Mirror of Production.
出处
《江苏行政学院学报》
2003年第4期17-22,共6页
The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
关键词
符号政治经济学
能指
所指
形而上学
The Political Economy of the Sign
Signifier
Signified
Metaphysics
