期刊文献+

康奈尔土壤健康评价系统及其应用 被引量:28

Introduction and Application of Cornell Soil Health Assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 土壤健康是土壤质量的可变部分,受人类利用和管理土壤方式的影响明显。因此,掌握农田土壤健康状况,对改进农田管理方式、提高农作物产量和质量具有重要意义。康奈尔土壤健康评价系统通过研究土壤健康指标,科学全面的评价农田土壤的健康状况。该系统从39个备选的土壤健康指标中选取物理指标、生物指标和化学指标各4个,作为描述土壤健康特征的量化指标;在采样分析获得各指标的指标值后,通过土壤健康评分函数,将测得的指标值转换为对应指标的分值,并在此基础上计算出土壤健康总分,用以定量评价农田土壤的综合健康状况。该测试系统面向农民、为农民服务,操作简单、易于理解,对我国开展农田土壤健康管理和评价工作具有参考价值。 Soil health is the dynamic part of soil quality, which is significantly affected by human utilization and managementmodes. Therefore, understanding soil health status is significant for improving soil management and enhancing crop production and quality. The Cornell Soil Health Assessment(CSHA) expresses soil health scientifically and comprehensively by analyzing the selected soil health indicators. For this purpose, twelve soil health indicators,including four physical indicators, four biological indicators and four chemical indicators, are selected from the examined thirty-nine candidate indicators. After the determination of each soil health indicator, the indicator value is transferred to indicator score from corresponding scoring function. Then, the overall soil health score can be calculated from the indicator scores to express the integrative soil health quantitatively. The CSHA is oriented to and serves farmers, and is with the properties as easy operating and understanding. The theories and methods behind CSHA are valuable for the management and assessment on agricultural soil in our country.
作者 盛丰
出处 《土壤通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1289-1296,共8页 Chinese Journal of Soil Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(51109017) 湖南省自然科学基金(13JJ3069) 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室开放基金(2012B097)资助
关键词 土壤健康 土壤健康指标 最小数据集 评分函数 土壤健康评价 Soil health Soil health indicator Minimum data set Scoring function Soil health assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1郑昭佩,刘作新.土壤质量及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):131-134. 被引量:189
  • 2Rong J. Yao,Jing S. Yang,Peng Gao,Jian B. Zhang,Wen H. Jin.Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area[J].Soil & Tillage Research.2012 被引量:1
  • 3Bianca N. Moebius,Harold M. van Es,Robert R. Schindelbeck,Omololu J. Idowu,Daniel J. Clune,Janice E. Thies.EVALUATION OF LABORATORY-MEASURED SOIL PROPERTIES AS INDICATORS OF SOIL PHYSICAL QUALITY[J].Soil Science.2007(11) 被引量:1
  • 4A.R. Dexter.Soil physical quality[J].Soil & Tillage Research.2004(2) 被引量:1
  • 5B.J. Wienhold,S.S. Andrews,D.L. Karlen.Soil Quality: A Review of the Science and Experiences in the USA[J].Environmental Geochemistry and Health.2004(2) 被引量:2

二级参考文献40

  • 1[1]Augustsson KA, Rundgren S. 1998. The advantages and disadvantages of Cognettia sphagnetorum in risk evaluation. Ambio, 27(1):61~68 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Baer SG, Rice CW, Blair JM. 2000. Assessment of soil quality in fields with short and long term enrollment in the CRP. J Soil Water Conser,(2): 142~146 被引量:1
  • 3[15]Jordan D, Kremer RJ, Bergfield WA,et al. 1995. Evaluation of microbial methods as potential indicators of soil quality in historical agricultural fields.Biol Ferti Soils, 19(4):297~302 被引量:1
  • 4[16]Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW,et al. 1997. Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial).J Soil Sci Soc Amer,61:4~10 被引量:1
  • 5[17]Karlen DL, Gardner JC, Rosek MJ. 1998. A soil quality framework for evaluating the impact of CRP.J Produc Agric,11(1): 56~60 被引量:1
  • 6[18]Kinako PDS. 1983. Assessment of relative soil quality by ecological bioassay.Afric J Ecol,21(4):291~295 被引量:1
  • 7[19]Lal R. 1998. Soil quality changes under continuous cropping for seventeen seasons of an alfisol in Western Nigeria.Land Degrad Develop,9(3): 259~274 被引量:1
  • 8[20]Liebig MA, Doran JW. 1999. Evaluation of point-scale assessment of soil quality.J Soil Water Conservation, 54(2): 510~518 被引量:1
  • 9[21]Maddonni GA, Urricariet S, Ghersa CM,et al. 1999. Assessing soil quality in the Rolling Pampa, using soil properties and maize characteristics.Agron J,91(2): 280~287 被引量:1
  • 10[22]Mann L, Tolbert V. 2000. Soil sustainability in renewable biomass plantings.Ambio,29(8):492~498 被引量:1

共引文献189

同被引文献541

引证文献28

二级引证文献455

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部