摘要
列斐伏尔与鲍德里亚虽然同是20世纪法国著名的消费社会批判理论重要代表,但二者之间的异质性也是明显的。列斐伏尔在20世纪上半叶规模化、机械化的福特制商品生产广泛普及的社会现实下积极思考消费问题,以"消费被控的官僚制社会"指认了当代资本主义新的统治特征。鲍德里亚则从关注日常生活消费的异化状况转向"符号政治经济学批判",最终放弃了列斐伏尔的消费社会批判分析逻辑,走向后马克思批判理论之路。对列斐伏尔与鲍德里亚消费社会理论的比较,成为了我们今天全面审视西方马克思主义消费社会批判理论的一面镜子。
Lefebvre and Baudrillard were both important representatives of the famous critical theory of consumer society in France in the 20 th century,but there are significant difference between them.In the first half of the 20 th century,Lefebvre actively thought about the consumption problem when large-scale mechanized commodity production of Ford model was widespread in society,and identified the'bureaucrat society where consumption is controlled'as the new dominant characteristic of contemporary capitalism.Baudrillard shifted his attention from alienation of daily consumption to'critique of semiotic political economics',and eventually gave up Lefebvre’s critical analysis logic of consumer society,and embraced the critical theory of post-Marxism,which is a clean break with Marxism.The comparison of Lefebvre’s and Baudrillard’s theory of consumer society provides us a mirror to examine how people’s attitude toward Marxism in the West changed from adherence to deviation.
作者
吴琼
WU Qiong(College of Marxism,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou,Zhejiang,325035)
出处
《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期145-152,共8页
Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences
基金
浙江省教育厅科研项目"列斐伏尔与鲍德里亚的‘消费社会’理论比较研究"(RZ1703028P01)
关键词
列斐伏尔
鲍德里亚
消费社会
次体系
符号政治经济学批判
Lefebvre
Baudrillard
consumer society
subordinate system
critique of semiotic political economics
