摘要
对2013年5月-2014年5月临床标本微生物检验资料进行统计分析,作为对照组;取2014年6月-2015年6月临床标本微生物检验资料作为观察组,对比评价两个时间段不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率结果。结果表明,在临床标本微生物检验阳性率上,观察组为17.76%,明显要比对照组的21.54%低,两组数据差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.983,P<0.05)。对于临床标本微生物检验来说,在不同时间段其阳性率存在差异;为了使临床标本微生物检验阳性率得到有效提高,有必要对标本采集步骤加以规范,进而为临床科学诊治提供客观凭据。
Taking May 2013-2014 clinical specimens of microbiological examination data as the control group; taking June 2014 to June 2015 clinical samples for microbiological examination data as the observation group, this paper compared and evaluated the results of two period of time of different clinical samples for microbiological examination positive rate. The result showed that for clinical specimens of microbiological examination positive rate, the observation group was 17.76%, significantly was 21.54% that lower than the control group, the difference between the two groups was with statistical significance(χ~2=4.983, P < 0.05). For clinical samples for microbiological examination, the positive rate of different time periods was different. In order to make clinical samples for microbiological test positive rate can be effectively improved, it is necessary to collect specimen steps to regulate, and scientific clinical diagnosis and treatment provide objective credentials.
出处
《生物化工》
2016年第5期42-44,共3页
Biological Chemical Engineering
关键词
临床标本
微生物检验
阳性率
Clinical specimen
Microbiological examination
Positive rate
