摘要
目的冠心病治疗应在控制病情发展的同时,预防心力衰竭及心肌梗死等并发症的发生,因此实施有效的护理干预措施具有重要的意义。本研究探讨责任制护理对冠心病患者护理质量及病情康复的影响。方法选取2017-03-01-2018-03-31抚顺市第二医院收治的冠心病患者86例,按照配比的方法分为对照组和观察组,各43例。给予对照组患者常规护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上实行责任制护理,对比两组护理效果。结果观察组和对照组沟通能力评分分别为(96.23±3.12)分和(86.55±5.23)分,差异有统计学意义,t=10.423,P<0.001;工作态度评分分别为(95.98±3.67)分和(85.34±5.24)分,差异有统计学意义,t=10.906,P<0.001;护理技巧评分分别为(95.76±3.45)分和(85.13±6.02)分,差异有统计学意义,t=10.046,P<0.001;书写规范评分分别为(96.53±3.14)分和(86.32±5.95)分,差异有统计学意义,t=9.952,P<0.001。观察组和对照组心绞痛发作评分分别为(92.34±4.25)分和(80.33±6.12)分,差异有统计学意义,t=10.570,P<0.001;心绞痛稳定性评分分别为(91.56±4.67)分和(80.67±5.78)分,差异有统计学意义,t=9.610,P<0.001;疾病认知程度评分为(90.33±5.08)分和(81.23±5.56)分,差异有统计学意义,t=7.923,P<0.001;治疗满意度评分为(91.67±5.35)分和(80.54±5.78)分,差异有统计学意义,t=9.267,P<0.001。结论给予冠心病患者责任护理可提升护理质量,改善患者临床症状,促进患者恢复。
OBJECTIVE The treatment of coronary heart disease should not only control the development of the disease,but also prevent the occurrence of complications such as heart failure and myocardial infarction.Therefore,it is of great significance to implement effective nursing intervention measures.This study explored the effect of responsibility system nursing on the quality of nursing and rehabilitation of patients with coronary heart disease.METHODS A total of86 patients with coronary heart disease admitted to Fushun Second Hospital from March 1,2017 to March 31,2018 were divided into control group and experimental group,43 cases in each group.Routine nursing intervention was given to patients in the control group,while responsibility system nursing was implemented in the experimental group on the basis of the control group.The nursing effects of the two groups were compared.RESULTS The communication ability scores of the experimental group and the control group were(96.23±3.12)and(86.55±5.23),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant,t=10.423,P<0.001.The work attitude scores were(95.98±3.67)and(85.34±5.24),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant,t=10.906,P<0.001.The nursing skill scores were(95.76±3.45)and(85.13±6.02),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant,t=10.046,P<0.001.The writing standard scores were(96.53±3.14)and(86.32±5.95),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant,t=9.952,P<0.001.The scores of angina pectoris in the observation group and the control group were(92.34±4.25)and(80.33±6.12),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant,t=10.570,P<0.001.The angina pectoris stability scores were(91.56±4.67)and(80.67±5.78),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant,t=9.610,P<0.001.The disease cognition scores were(90.33±5.08)and(81.23±5.56),and the difference was statistically significant,t=7.923,P<0.001.The treatment satisfaction scores were(91.67±5.35)and(80.54±5.78)points,and t
作者
李秀洁
孔凡华
LI Xiu-jie;KONG Fan-hua(Department of Cardiology,Fushun Second Hospital,Fushun113001,P.R.China)
出处
《社区医学杂志》
2019年第2期96-98,共3页
Journal Of Community Medicine
关键词
责任制护理
冠心病
护理质量
病情康复
responsibility system nursing
coronary heart disease
nursing quality
rehabilitation
