期刊文献+

上海市社区绿地空间格局调查及对比分析——以瑞金社区、莘城社区、方松社区为例 被引量:8

Survey and Comparative Analysis on Green Space Pattern of Urban Community in Shanghai——Case from Ruijin,Xincheng,and Fangsong Community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了分析上海市社区绿地空间分布特征并提出优化策略,作者选取了上海不同建设年代的3个典型城市社区:黄浦瑞金社区、闵行莘城社区和松江方松社区,通过对比分析各社区绿地景观斑块的平均分维数、聚集度指数、破碎度指数、蔓延度指数、连接度指数等景观生态学指数,来研究上海城市社区绿地的空间分布特征。研究结果表明:1)瑞金社区、莘城社区和方松社区的破碎化指数分别为0.77、0.45和0.40,瑞金社区的绿地景观破碎化程度最高,莘城社区和方松社区的绿地景观破碎化程度明显低于瑞金社区。2)瑞金社区、莘城社区和方松社区的蔓延度指数分别为76.16、69.02和66.14,反映出方松社区绿地分布较为均匀。3)瑞金社区、莘城社区和方松社区的连接度指数分别为40.07、53.18和70.61,表明方松社区中各类型绿地斑块间的空间联系较为紧密。 Research on the green space pattern of community has practical meaning for analyzing green space distribution and optimizing its structure.In this paper,three typical communities constructed at different times in Shanghai were studied including Huangpu Ruijin community,Minhang Xincheng community and Songjiang Fangsong community.The spatial distribution of green space in the three communities was surveyed and analyzed through landscape indexes including landscape patch fractal dimension,aggregation index,fragmentation index,contagion index,and connectivity index.The results showed that 1)the fragmentation indexes of Ruijin,Xincheng and Fangsong were 0.77,0.45 and 0.40,respectively.The degree of green landscape fragmentation of Xincheng or Fangsong was significantly lower than that of the Ruijin;2)the contagion indexes of Ruijin,Xincheng and Fangsong communities were76.16,69.02 and 66.14,respectively,reflecting the more uniform distribution of green space of the Fangsong community;3)the connectivity indexes of the three communities were 70.61,53.18 and 40.07,respectively,showing that the green space of Fangsong community is closely connected.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(农业科学版)》 2014年第6期52-57,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Agricultural Science)
基金 国家十二五科技支撑计划项目(2012BAC13B04-05)
关键词 社区 GIS 绿地格局 空间优化 community GIS green space pattern space optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1孙娟,蓝崇钰,夏汉平,辛琨.基于QuickBird卫星影像的贵港市城市景观格局分析[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(1):50-54. 被引量:40
  • 2陈利顶,傅伯杰.景观连接度的生态学意义及其应用[J].生态学杂志,1996,15(4):37-42. 被引量:123
  • 3赵晓燕,刘康,秦耀民.基于GIS的西安市城市景观格局[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(5):706-711. 被引量:19
  • 4严玲璋.上海市城市绿化的形式及21世纪的设想[J].生态园林论文续集(园林增刊),1993,:80-82. 被引量:1
  • 5上海园林科学研究所.上海市绿化遥感综合调查专题论文集[J].上海园林科技,1990,4:21-35. 被引量:5
  • 6[40]Andrew S, Sally PH. 1997. Wildlife conservation in urban greenways of the mid-southeastern United States [ J ]. Urban Ecosyst. , 1:103 ~ 116. 被引量:1
  • 7[41]Armando AA., Mark SP. 2002. Mapping and analysis of changes in the riparian landscape structure of the Lockyer Valley catchment, Queensland, Australia[J ]. Landscape. Urban Plan, 59: 43~57. 被引量:1
  • 8[42]Dale AQ, Jeffrey CL. 1999. Thermal infrared remote sensing for analysis of landscape ecological processes: methods and applications[ J ]. Landscape Ecol., 14: 577~ 598. 被引量:1
  • 9[43]David MS. 2000. GAP management status and regional indicators of threats to biodiversity[ J ]. Landscape Ecol., 15: 21 ~ 33. 被引量:1
  • 10[44]Douglas OF. 2001. Forest fragmentation in Loudoun County,Virginia, USA evaluated with multitemporal Landsat imagery[J ]. Landscape Ecol., 16: 627~ 642. 被引量:1

共引文献207

同被引文献115

引证文献8

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部