摘要
目的对比两种引流装置的在新生儿胃肠减压治疗中的引流效果与不良反应。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2012年6月需要行胃肠减压的患者119例,随机使用两种引流装置。试验组50例,使用注射器改制的常压引流器;对照组69例,使用负压胃肠减压器,观察两种引流装置在新生儿胃肠减压治疗中的引流效果和不良反应。结果随着引流天数的增加,试验组的引流量显著高于对照组(P<0.05),胃肠减压期间呕吐发生例数和胃出血发生率试验组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与负压胃肠减压器相比,注射器改制的常压引流器具有良好的引流效果,呕吐发生例数和胃出血发生率低,计量操作方便,是新生儿胃肠减压的优选方式。
Objective To compare the efficacy and side effects of two drainage devices in neonatal gastrointestinal des-compression. Methods A retrospectively controlled design was used. A total number of 119 patients were enrolled,50 patients in the study group and 69 patients in the control group. A drainage reformed from a Syringe with normal pressure was used in the study group,while a negative pressure drainage was used in the control group. The efficacy and side effects in gastrointestinal descompres-sion treatment of both drainage devices were studied. Results The amount of drainage was significantly larger in the study group than the control group as the draining period was lasting (P<0. 05),the number of patients complicated with omitting and gastric bleeding was significantly smaller in the study group than the control group ( P<0. 05 ) . Conclusion When compared to negative pressure drainage,the Syringe refromed drainage with normal pressure showed to be more effective on draining with a lower risk of omitting and gastric bleeding. This easy measuring drainage device was shown to be a prior device in neonatal gastrointestinal des-compression.
出处
《四川医学》
CAS
2014年第11期1468-1469,共2页
Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词
新生儿
胃肠减压
引流器
比较
neonatal
gastrointestinal descompression
drainage device
comparison
