摘要
目的:比较小夹板与石膏固定治疗A2型桡骨远端骨折的效果。方法:选取我院2014年11月-2015年10月收治的A2型桡骨远端骨折患者96例,随机分为观察组和对照组各48例,观察组患者进行小夹板固定治疗,对照组患者在采用石膏固定治疗,3个月后比较两组患者治疗效果和生活质量。结果:3个月后观察组患者治疗总有效率(95.85%)高于对照组患者的治疗总有效率(89.58%),观察组患者生活质量评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:小夹板与石膏固定治疗桡骨远端骨折在临床应用均较广泛,小夹板固定治疗更利于患者的恢复,提高患者生活质量,临床上有显著意义。
Objective:To compare the effect of small splint immobilization and plaster fixation to cure A2 type of distal radius fracture.Methods:Collect 96 cases of A2 type distal radius fractures patients in our hospital from November 2014 to October 2015, randomly divided them into observation group and control group, n=48. Patients in observation group were treated by small splint immobilization, Patients in control group were treated by plaster fixation, therapeutic effects and living quality of patients in two groups were compared.Results:After 3 months,total effective rate of patients in observation group(95.85%)was higher than that of patients in control group(89.58%), living quality of patients in observation group was significantly higher than that of control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Both small splint immobilization and plaster fixation are widely used to treat distal radius fractures in clinical, small splint immobilization will be beneficial for recovery, and improve patients' living quality, it is a significant clinical significance.
出处
《中国妇幼健康研究》
2016年第S1期4-4,共1页
Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词
小夹板固定
石膏固定
A2型桡骨远端骨折
Small splint immobilization
Plaster fixation
A2 type distal radius fracture
