摘要
目的 检验攻击性驾驶行为系列测试量表中文译本的效度和信度。方法 对 3 5 3名不同车型的汽车驾驶员开展攻击性驾驶行为调查 ,进行了重测信度、同质性信度检验和判别效度、预测效度、效标效度检验。结果 各测试量表的重测信度为 0 .84～0 .93 ;Cronbachalpha系数为 0 .76～ 0 .92。效度检验表明 ,此量表能够区分不同性格类型的驾驶者 ;量表得分与事故经历有显著相关 ;并与siegel’s多维愤怒量表得分显著相关。结论 攻击性驾驶行为系列量表 (中文译本 )有较好的信度和效度。
Objective This study is to test the reliability and validity of aggressive driving questionnaires in Chinese version. Methods A total of 353 automobile drivers were investigated with Deffenbacher's driving anger scale, driving stress scale, driving vengeance questionnaires (DVQ), driver behavior questionnaire, and driver violence scale. 41 individuals took the tests twice with one week between tests. Results The test retest reliability of the scales, varying from 0.84 to 0.93, seemed acceptable. Cronbach alpha of 0.76～0.92 indicate a good internal consistency. Drivers with Type A behavior indicated high level of aggressive driving than Type B. We also found significant correlation between the scales score and number of self reported vehicle accidents. Every scale scores correlated significant with scores on seigel's Multidimensional Anger Inventory. Conclusion Good reliability and validity of the aggressive driving questionnaires in Chinese version was demonstrated.
出处
《中国行为医学科学》
CAS
CSCD
2003年第3期335-337,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金
CMB项目基金资助 (2 0 0 2 ) (SupportedbyCMB)
关键词
攻击性驾驶行为
信度
效度
Aggressive driving
Reliability
Validity
