摘要
通过比对研究发现 ,美国、欧盟反倾销法在“非市场经济国家出口产品正常价值的确定”、“公共利益的考虑”、“对出口商替进口商交纳反倾销税的作弊行为的制裁”、“反规避的措施”和“承诺”问题上存在微妙差异 ,而这几个问题在我国反倾销法中或未涉及 ,或阐述较为粗略。研究这些差异 ,将有助于完善我国反倾销法以及更好地应对美国、欧盟反倾销调查。
By comparison and analysis, we find that there are some microdifferences on some problems in the anti-dumping laws in the U S A and in the E U , such as: the confirmation on normal value of the exports from the non-market economy countries, the consideration on public interests, the punishments on cheats that taxes of anti-dumping are paid by exportors instead of importors, the measures of anti-escaping and the promise Yet, these problems are not concerned or are elaborated simply in the anti-dumping laws of P R China By researching these differences, we can consummate our anti-dumping laws and we can benefit a lot when facing anti-dumping investigation from the U S A and the E U
出处
《中央财经大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第7期45-47,共3页
Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
