摘要
为了维护欧盟法律秩序的自主性,欧盟司法机构在其做出的一系列判决中否定了欧盟加入含有国际争端解决机制的国际协定,这显示出欧盟法律秩序对国际法治排斥的一面。文章通过对欧盟法院及其前身欧共体法院对该问题做出的一系列判决进行分析后认为,当国际司法机构对欧盟法进行解释适用、处理欧盟与成员国责任分担等问题时会违反欧盟法律秩序的自主性。欧盟准备在与美国谈判的《TTIP协定》中设立投资法庭机制以取代投资仲裁用于解决投资争端,考虑到欧盟法律秩序的特性,该机制能否应用于实践中取决于其具体规则与欧盟法律秩序的兼容性。
The European Court of Justice has consistently rejected EU’s admission to international agreement with international dispute settlement system to preserve the autonomy of EU’s legal order,which reveals EU’s exclusion of international rule of law.After a comprehensive analysis of relevant cases given by Court of Justice of European Union and its predecessor,the article finds that interpretation and application of EU law by international judicial bodies,distribution of responsibilities between the EU and its member states by these bodies and others issues will violate the autonomy of EU’s legal order.The EU prepares to replace the current investment arbitration system with investment court system in the TTIP Agreement negotiated with the USA,whether this mechanism will be applied to practices depends largely on the compatibility of its specific rules with EU’s legal order considering the characters of EU’s legal order.
出处
《欧洲法律评论》
2017年第1期85-101,共17页
Chinese Journal of European Law
关键词
欧盟法律秩序
自主性
国际争端解决机制
兼容性
投资法庭机制
EU’s Legal Order
Autonomy
International Dispute Settlement Mechanism
Compatibility
Investment Court System
