摘要
规范保护目的是限缩不法的构成要件阻却事由。法益侵害事实符合相当因果关系,但不在规范保护目的之内的,也不归责。仿照德国主张以规范保护目的取代预见可能性标准的观点过于激进,有违责任主义,因此我国不宜采纳。司法适用中,不同法条之间的过失规范保护目的竞合时,应当遵从特别法优先原则,禁止一般法回旋评价;同一法条中,没有必要采取义务个数单一说,而宜采取实质解释。在国民的预见可能性和常识性检验范围内,承认多个规范保护目的存在,妥当处罚。
The protection purpose of norm is a component elimination factor to restrict the illegal scope.It means even there is an adequate causation existed,if the protection purpose of norm can not be fulfilled,the negligent crime will not be established.The viewpoint which suggests the foreseeability should be substituted by the protection purpose of norm is not proper,because it makes a violation of schuld prinzip.In the judicial practice,we should insist on the principle of special law priority when the protection purpose of norms concurrence existed.What's more,in the same norm multiple protection purposes can be admitted,the judge can use substantive interpretation to determine the negligent crime with the reference of foreseeability and common sense review.
出处
《刑法论丛》
CSSCI
2018年第1期144-173,共30页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
过失犯
规范保护目的
预见可能性
归责方法
Negligent crime
Protection purpose of norm
Foreseeability
Aplication method
