摘要
目的探讨评价阻塞性呼吸睡眠暂停综合征(OSAHS)进入临床路径所取得的效果,为OSAHS的临床路径的推广提供依据。方法对比分析2组OSAHS患者(一组进入临床路径,另一组未进入临床路径)在治疗费用、患者满意度、诊疗次数、治疗效果方面的差异。结果 2组患者戴用口腔矫治器治疗均有很好的临床效果,但两者的临床疗效比较差异无统计学意义。进入临床路径的一组在患者满意度、费用、时间花费等方面要优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论关于OSAHS的临床路径能使患者得到便利,可以降低医疗费用、降低就诊次数和提高患者满意度。
Objective To discuss the effect of clinical pathway on patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHA) so as to offer theoretical foundation for popularizing the clinical pathway in OSAHA. Methods Two groups of patients with OSAHA(one group in the clinical pathway,another not in clinical pathway) was compared and analyzed the difference in terms of the cost of treatment,the patient satisfaction,time and treatment effect. Results The patients in the two groups who used the oral appliances treatment had good clinical effects,but there was no statistically difference in the clinical efficacy of two groups. Patients who were in the clinical pathway group were better in terms of patient satisfaction,cost and time than were in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0. 05). Conclusion The clinical pathway of OSAHS which is being implemented in our hospital can not only offer convenience to patients,but also reduce the costs,the number of treatment,improving patient' satisfaction.
出处
《宁夏医学杂志》
CAS
2014年第6期507-509,共3页
Ningxia Medical Journal
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(81260171)
宁夏科技成果转化资金项目(200612)
