摘要
192 0年井田制辩论不仅在经济史上有重要意义 ,更是 2 0世纪中国史学史上的一件大事 ,它代表着唯物史观派与史料派的初次交锋。辩论根源于治史理念上的歧异 :史观派的胡汉民、廖仲恺视史实重建为中心任务 ,史料派的胡适以史料整理为首要工作。针对井田制问题 ,双方的立论角度和研究门径截然异趣 :前者侧重于井田制的经济史分析 ,努力借取西方社会科学的成果和方法 ;后者着眼于井田的史料沿革 ,谨守广搜精考、穷源毕流的清儒成法。作为方法之争的井田制辩论 ,史观派最终占了上风。其后史观、史料两派的命运却大为不同。
The controversy about nine square land system in 1920 is a significant event in the Chinese history besides the economic history in the 20th century The historical material school first conflicted with the textual criticism school in it The controversy resulted from the contradictory in the methods of the philosophy history It rooted in the difference on academicideas Hu Han min and Liao Zhong kai,who belonged to the historical material school,thought reconstructing history as the central task On the contrary,Hu Shi,the leader of the textual criticism school,regarded historical material as chief work They diverged on angle and method The former researched it with the help of western social science The latter inspected the idea of it by textual criticism The historical material school won the controversy However,the fates of the both sides were very different
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第3期32-38,共7页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
关键词
唯物史现派
史料派
井田制
现代学术史
Historical Material School,Textual Criticism School,Nine square Land system,History of Modern Academic
