期刊文献+

罪刑法定主义的价值诉求

Value in the Principle of a Legally Prescribed Punishment for a Specific Crime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为刑法的古老原则——罪刑法定原则从一开始出现,人们对它的理解就有形式主义和实质主义之争。形式主义的罪行法定原则因追求法律的尽善尽美而在现实中成为永远无法实现的神话;实质主义的罪刑法定原则因过分批判法律的内客的确定性而形成以司法为中心的畸形的法律制度。有批判地创造性接受这是我们应有的做法。我们不论在立法上还是在实践上都应跳出实质主义和形式主义的窠臼,真正实现罪刑法定原则的价值。 Ever since the initiation of this old principle of criminal law - the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specific crime, people have had two distinct understandings of it, namely formalism that has been unrealistic due to its aspiration for a perfect law, and essentialism, which has led to a malformed legal system centered on judicatory due to its strong criticism on the certainty of law. What we should do is to accept with criticism and creativity and jump out of the set patterns of formalism and essentialism both in legislation and in reality to realize the true value contained in the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specific crime.
作者 洪华芬
机构地区 浙江教育学院
出处 《浙江教育学院学报》 2003年第2期16-21,共6页 Journal of ZHEJIANG Education Institute
关键词 罪刑 法定主义 价值 法定原别 刑法 形式主义 实质主义 中国 essentialism formalism legally prescribed punishment for a specific crime
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1陈兴良著..刑法哲学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:705.
  • 2张乃根著..西方法哲学史纲[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993:341.
  • 3[英]霍布斯(Hobbes) 著,黎思复,黎廷弼.利维坦[M]商务印书馆,1985. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部