摘要
'阳常有余,阴常不足'和'阳非有余,阴常不足'两种观点分别由金元四大家之一的朱丹溪和明代著名医家张景岳提出。两种观点截然相反,后世医家亦各执一理,争执不休未有定论。文章作者认为,两种理论之间不存在直接的冲突,之所以存在争论是因为两医家对阴阳的含义指代不清,笼统地将生理的阴阳和病理的阴阳统称为阴阳,以致有阳气有余和不足的歧义。文章将阴阳细分为具有促进生理功能的正阴、正阳和导致病理变化的邪阴、邪阳,以此四分法调解'阳常有余,阴常不足'和'阳非有余,阴长不足'之争,为这一理论争鸣提供新的视角。
The viewpoint that‘Yang often being excess while Yin often being insufficient’comes from ZHU Danxi.And the opinion that‘Yang being not excess,and Yin often being insufficient’is brought out by ZHANG Jingyue.The two viewpoints are conflicting,and leads to long term argument of traditional Chinese medicine practitioners of later generations.According to the author of the article,there’s no direct conflict between the two viewpoints.Arguments on this subject is mainly caused by ambiguity in definitions of Yin and Yang.This article classified Yin and Yang into physiological Yin and Yang,and pathological Yin and Yang,to compromise a dispute between‘Yang often being excess’and‘Yang being not in excess’.It tries to provide a new viewpoint to the debate.
作者
曹昺焱
朱世鹏
刘通
陈卓
CAO Bingyan;ZHU Shipeng;LIU Tong;CHEN Zhuo(Xiyuan Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100091,China;The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210046,Jiangsu,China;Guangdong Second Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510095,Guangdong,China)
出处
《辽宁中医杂志》
CAS
2019年第8期1615-1616,共2页
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(81703928)
关键词
阴阳
邪正
阳常有余
阳非有余
Yin and Yang
pathogenic Qi or healthy Qi
Yang often being excess
Yang being not excess
