摘要
早期国家形成过程中最有影响力的有两种模式论 :氏族模式论 (氏族→部落→部落联盟→国家 )和酋邦模式论 (群队→部落→酋邦→国家 )。一部分学者认为氏族模式过时了 ,主张用酋邦模式代替氏族模式。但仍有一些学者固守氏族模式论是惟一正确的国家起源模式。其实 ,这两种观点都存在片面性 ,本文提出一种新的国家起源模式 :氏族→部族→分化社会→原始国家。
There are two kinds of model theory about state forming in the early stage,which are making a strong impact,they are clan model theory(clan→tribe→tribal confederacy→state) and tribe country model theory(group→tribe→tribe country→state).Some scholars think that clan model theory is out of date,and maintain that clan model theory should be represented by tribe country model theory;however,there are some scholars who defend tenaciously clan model theory is only right.In fact,both of views are one-sided,so this article will compare these two models and put forward a new kind of model about state origin:clan→tribe→divided society→primitive state.
出处
《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第2期71-75,共5页
Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
国家起源
氏族
部落
部落联盟
国家
奠邦
群队
State origin
clan
tribe
tribe confederacy
state
tribe country
group.
