摘要
本文从《营造法式》图样'殿堂八铺作双槽草架侧样图'中一条小注'斗底槽准此,下双槽同'的疏证开始,指出将其通释成'’斗底槽’侧样与’双槽’侧样相同',有悖于古籍训诂中'随文释义注疏'的原则。进而指出:将'斗底'解释成'斗'的形态(回字形)的一个无法逾越的障碍,是'斗形'与条状的'槽'相悖。既然《营造法式》是以'殿阁地盘图'与'草架侧样图'配合,来描述殿堂结构,就不应当脱离殿堂结构的属性去建空中楼阁。指出:'铺作层'是殿堂结构的特征,殿阁地盘图则是描述铺作层分槽形式的图,草架侧样图中的铺作形式,则反映了槽的深度。
The paper starts with the discussion of an annotation in the illustration of Yingzao Fashi(The Treatise of Architectural Methods published in Song dynasty).It pinpointed that the interpretation of this annotation is'Doudicao’s profile is the same as the section Shuangcao profile',which violates the principle of Chinese ancient semantics.An argument based on a misinterpretation of this annotation is invalid.Furthermore,it is pointed out that the'Doudi'is interpreted as the shape of'dou'is contradictory to the'Cao(Slot)'.The layout of Dipanfencao is used to describe the structure of the palatial halls(diantang),and should not be explained away from the properties of the structure.The'laying layer'is the characteristics of the structure of palatial halls,and the layout of Dipanfencao is diagram describing the form of'Fengcao'.
出处
《建筑史》
2018年第1期79-87,共9页
基金
国家自然科学基金项目“《营造法式》大木结构研究”的阶段性成果(项目批准号:51578155)
关键词
《营造法式》地盘分槽图
斗底
殿堂结构
分槽形式
分心斗底槽
金箱斗底槽
Yingzao Fashi
layout of Dipanfencao
Doudi
structure of palatial halls(diantang)
the form of'Fengcao'
Fenxindoudicao
Jinxiangdoudicao
