摘要
目的探讨撬拔复位与切开复位内固定治疗SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折临床疗效及安全性差异。方法随机选取该院2010年1月—2015年1月收治SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折患者80例,采用随机数字表法分为A组(40例)和B组(40例),分别采用撬拔复位与切开复位内固定治疗;比较两组患者临床疗效和术后并发症发生率。结果 B组患者临床疗效显著优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组患者术后并发症发生率显著低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于撬拔复位内固定,切开复位内固定治疗SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折可有效促进术后足部功能,降低并发症发生风险,具有临床应用价值。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between reduction by leverage and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of Sanders II type calcaneus fracture. Methods 80 patients with Sanders Ⅱ type calcaneus fracture with were chosen in the period from January 2010 to January 2015 in our hospital and randomly divided into group A(n=40) and group B(n=40) to receive reduction by leverage and open reduction and internal fixation respectively, and the clinical effects and postoperative complication rate of both groups were compared. Results The clinical effects of group B was significantly better than of group A(P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate of group B was significantly better than that of group A(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with reduction by leverage, open reduction and internal fixation can bring better effect in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ type calcaneus fracture in promoting the postoperative foot function and lowering the rate of complication.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第28期109-110,118,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
撬拔复位
切开复位
内固定
跟骨骨折
疗效
安全性
Reduction by leverage
Open reduction
Internal fixation
Calcaneus fracture
Clinical effects
Safety
